Lee Wan-Ju, Briars Leslie, Lee Todd A, Calip Gregory S, Suda Katie J, Schumock Glen T
Departments of *Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, and †Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; ‡Center of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomic Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and §Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, Illinois.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016 Oct;22(10):2410-7. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000880.
Early initiation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor (TNFI) therapy for children and young adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is not well described.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children and young adults (≤24 yr) newly diagnosed with IBD using health insurance claims from 2009 to 2013. The conventional "step-up" approach was defined as TNFI initiation >30 days after first IBD medication prescription, whereas the "top-down" approach was defined as new TNFI prescription within 30 days of first IBD medication prescription. Switching rates, time to initiation, discontinuation, and adherence to TNFIs were compared between the 2 strategies.
A total of 11,962 IBD patients were identified. Among 3300 TNFI users, 1298 (39.3%) were treated with the top-down approach, whereas 2002 (60.7%) were treated with the step-up approach. Top-down approach use increased from 31.4% to 49.8% during the 5-year period, and under this approach, most patients were treated with TNFIs alone. Time to TNFI initiation was shorter for patients diagnosed in more recent years. Patients treated with the top-down strategy had lower rates of corticosteroid use (32.5% versus 94.2%) compared with step-up treatment but presented a higher rate of TNFI discontinuation. The 2 strategies both exhibited high adherence (mean proportion of days covered: 83.7%-95.4%).
Early TNFI initiation increased over time for children and young adults with IBD and was related to lower rates of corticosteroid use compared with the conventional approach. However, the higher rate of TNFI discontinuation under the top-down approach requires further examination.
对于患有炎症性肠病(IBD)的儿童和年轻人,早期开始使用肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂(TNFI)治疗的情况尚未得到充分描述。
我们利用2009年至2013年的医疗保险理赔数据,对新诊断为IBD的儿童和年轻人(≤24岁)进行了一项回顾性队列研究。传统的“逐步升级”方法定义为在首次开具IBD药物处方后30天以上开始使用TNFI,而“自上而下”方法定义为在首次开具IBD药物处方后30天内开具新的TNFI处方。比较了两种策略之间的转换率、开始使用时间、停药情况和对TNFI的依从性。
共识别出11962例IBD患者。在3300例TNFI使用者中,1298例(39.3%)采用自上而下的方法治疗,而2002例(60.7%)采用逐步升级的方法治疗。在5年期间,自上而下方法的使用从31.4%增加到49.8%,在这种方法下,大多数患者仅接受TNFI治疗。近年来诊断的患者开始使用TNFI的时间较短。与逐步升级治疗相比,采用自上而下策略治疗的患者使用皮质类固醇的比例较低(32.5%对94.2%),但TNFI停药率较高。两种策略均表现出高依从性(平均覆盖天数比例:83.7%-95.4%)。
随着时间的推移,IBD儿童和年轻人早期开始使用TNFI的情况有所增加,与传统方法相比,皮质类固醇的使用比例较低。然而,自上而下方法下较高的TNFI停药率需要进一步研究。