Nelson Craig
Director of Medical Bioethics at the South Bay Medical Center in Harbor City, CA, and a Claremont School of Theology Library Scholar in CA.
Perm J. 2016 Fall;20(4):16-023. doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-023. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
An ethics of permission can be helpful in framing a response to the ethical differences surrounding the California End of Life Option Act. Law does not define morality, and reaching a moral understanding demands thorough reflection. An ethics of permission examines the ethical demands of a permissive law for both clinician and patient. Serving the good of the patient, respecting professional conscience, and following the law are three ethical elements. Although developing an ethics of permission includes these three elements, these elements do not exhaust all the moral implications involved. An ethics of permission also includes the importance of exercising professional tolerance in the honoring of clinicians who choose to participate or refuse to participate. In addition, an ethics of permission also provides insight in implementing just and fair behavior among medical professionals.
一种允许伦理有助于构建对围绕《加利福尼亚州临终选择法案》的伦理差异的回应。法律并不界定道德,达成道德理解需要深入思考。允许伦理审视了一部允许性法律对临床医生和患者双方的伦理要求。服务患者利益、尊重职业良知以及遵守法律是三个伦理要素。虽然发展一种允许伦理包含这三个要素,但这些要素并未穷尽其中涉及的所有道德含义。允许伦理还包括在尊重选择参与或拒绝参与的临床医生方面践行职业宽容的重要性。此外,允许伦理还为在医疗专业人员中实施公正公平的行为提供了见解。