Dobran Mauro, Nasi Davide, Brunozzi Denise, di Somma Lucia, Gladi Maurizio, Iacoangeli Maurizio, Scerrati Massimo
Department of Neurosurgery, Umberto I General Hospital, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca #71, Ancona, 60020, Italy.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Oct;158(10):1883-9. doi: 10.1007/s00701-016-2907-0. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
The surgical management of thoracolumbar burst fractures frequently involves posterior pedicle screw fixation. However, the application of short- or long-segment instrumentation is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of the short-segment fixation with inclusion of the fracture level (SSFIFL) versus the traditional long-segment fixation (LSF) for the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar junction fractures.
From December 2009 to February 2014, 60 patients with unstable thoracolumbar junction fractures (T11-L2) were divided into two groups according to the number of instrumented levels. Group 1 included 30 patients treated by SSFIFL (six-screw construct including the fracture level). Group 2 included 30 patients treated by LSF (eight-screw construct excluding the fracture level). Local kyphosis angle (LKA), anterior body height (ABH), posterior body height (PBH), ABH/PBH ratio of fractured vertebra, and Asia Scale Impairment Scale were evaluated.
The two groups were similar in regard to age, sex, trauma etiology, fracture level, fracture type, neurologic status, pre-operative LKA, ABH, PBH, and ABH/PBH ratio and follow-up (p > 0.05). Reduction of post-traumatic kyphosis (assessed with LKA) and restoration of fracture-induced wedge shape of the vertebral body (assessed with ABH, PBH, and ABH/PBH ratio) at post-operative period were not significantly different between group 1 and group 2 (p = 0.234; p = 0.754). There was no significant difference between the two groups in term of correction loss at the last follow-up too (LKA was 15.97° ± 5.62° for SSFIFL and 17.76° ± 11.22° for LSF [p = 0.427]). Neurological outcome was similar in both groups.
Inclusion of fracture level in a short-segment fixation for a thoracolumbar junction fractures results in a kyphosis correction and in a maintenance of the sagittal alignment similar to a long-segment instrumentation. Finally, this technique allowed us to save two or more segments of vertebral motion.
胸腰椎爆裂骨折的手术治疗通常涉及后路椎弓根螺钉固定。然而,短节段或长节段内固定的应用仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较包含骨折节段的短节段固定(SSFIFL)与传统长节段固定(LSF)治疗不稳定胸腰段交界性骨折的疗效。
2009年12月至2014年2月,60例不稳定胸腰段交界性骨折(T11-L2)患者根据固定节段数量分为两组。第1组包括30例接受SSFIFL治疗的患者(包括骨折节段的六螺钉结构)。第2组包括30例接受LSF治疗的患者(不包括骨折节段的八螺钉结构)。评估局部后凸角(LKA)、椎体前缘高度(ABH)、椎体后缘高度(PBH)、骨折椎体的ABH/PBH比值以及亚洲脊髓损伤量表。
两组在年龄、性别、创伤病因、骨折节段、骨折类型、神经功能状态、术前LKA、ABH、PBH、ABH/PBH比值及随访时间方面相似(p>0.05)。术后第1组和第2组创伤后后凸的矫正(用LKA评估)以及骨折导致的椎体楔形形态的恢复(用ABH、PBH和ABH/PBH比值评估)无显著差异(p = 0.234;p = 0.754)。两组在末次随访时的矫正丢失方面也无显著差异(SSFIFL的LKA为15.97°±5.62°,LSF的LKA为17.76°±11.22°[p = 0.427])。两组的神经功能结果相似。
在胸腰段交界性骨折的短节段固定中包含骨折节段,可实现与长节段内固定相似的后凸矫正和矢状面排列维持。最后,该技术使我们能够保留两个或更多节段的椎体活动。