Suppr超能文献

经皮与传统开放椎弓根螺钉固定治疗单节段胸腰椎脊柱损伤的比较结果:随机对照试验

Comparative Outcomes of Percutaneous and Conventional Open Pedicle Screw Fixation for Single-level Thoracolumbar Spine Injury: Randomised Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Choovongkomol K, Piyapromdee U, Thepjung S, Tanaviriyachai T, Jongkittanakul S, Sudprasert W

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.

出版信息

Malays Orthop J. 2024 Mar;18(1):106-115. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2403.014.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To compare post-operative outcomes of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) vs open pedicle screw fixation (OPSF) in patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures with no neurological deficits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a randomised controlled trial, patients received short-segment fixation with intermediate screws. We assessed post-operative back pain (Visual Analog Scale or VAS), blood loss, operative/fluoroscopy times, radiographic parameters, and oswestry disability index (ODI) scores at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and October 2019, 31 patients received PPSF and 30 OPSF. Mean intra-operative blood loss was 66.45 (±44.29) ml for PPSF vs 184.83 (±128.36) ml for OPSF (p<0.001). Fluoroscopy time averaged 2.36 (±0.76) minutes for PPSF vs 0.58 (±0.51) minutes for OPSF (p<0.001). No significant differences existed in operative time or post-operative VAS scores. Radiographic parameters (kyphosis angle and vertebral height ratios) didn't significantly differ post-operatively or at 12 months. However, ODI scores differed significantly at 6 months (p=0.025), with no difference at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

In this trial, PPSF was comparable to OPSF in improving ODI scores at 12 months but showed earlier improvement at 6 months and reduced blood loss. Radiographic outcomes remained similar between groups over 12 months.

摘要

引言

比较无神经功能缺损的胸腰椎骨折患者经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术(PPSF)与开放椎弓根螺钉固定术(OPSF)的术后结果。

材料与方法

在一项随机对照试验中,患者接受中间螺钉短节段固定。我们在术后1、2、3、6、9和12个月评估背痛(视觉模拟评分或VAS)、失血量、手术/透视时间、影像学参数和奥斯维斯特功能障碍指数(ODI)评分。

结果

2018年1月至2019年10月期间,31例患者接受了PPSF,30例接受了OPSF。PPSF组术中平均失血量为66.45(±44.29)ml,而OPSF组为184.83(±128.36)ml(p<0.001)。PPSF组透视时间平均为2.36(±0.76)分钟,而OPSF组为0.58(±0.51)分钟(p<0.001)。手术时间或术后VAS评分无显著差异。术后及12个月时,影像学参数(后凸角和椎体高度比)无显著差异。然而,ODI评分在6个月时差异显著(p=0.025),12个月时无差异。

结论

在本试验中,PPSF在12个月时改善ODI评分方面与OPSF相当,但在6个月时改善更早且失血量减少。两组在12个月内的影像学结果相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9740/11023354/29c90ca008ba/moj-18-106-f1.jpg

相似文献

3
Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb;46(1):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0998-4. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

3
Finite Element Analysis of Short- Versus Long-Segment Posterior Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Aug;128:e1109-e1117. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.077. Epub 2019 May 17.
5
Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation for treatment of type A thoracolumbar fractures.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb;46(1):147-152. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0998-4. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
6
Efficacy and safety of minimal pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures: a meta-analysis.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Jul;22(1 Suppl):45-52. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201807_15362.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验