Baba Hiroshi, Petrenko Andrey B, Fujiwara Naoshi
Division of Anesthesiology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.
Division of Anesthesiology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.
Brain Res. 2016 Oct 1;1648(Pt A):445-458. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
Pregabalin is thought to exert its therapeutic effect in neuropathic pain via binding to α2δ-1 subunits of voltage-gated calcium (Ca(2+)) channels. However, the exact analgesic mechanism after its binding to α2δ-1 subunits remains largely unknown. Whether a clinical concentration of pregabalin (≈10μM) can cause acute inhibition of dorsal horn neurons in the spinal cord is controversial. To address this issue, we undertook intracellular Ca(2+)-imaging studies using spinal cord slices with an intact attached L5 dorsal root, and examined if pregabalin acutely inhibits the primary afferent stimulation-evoked excitation of dorsal horn neurons in normal rats and in rats with streptozotocin-induced painful diabetic neuropathy. Under normal conditions, stimulation of a dorsal root evoked Ca(2+) signals predominantly in the superficial dorsal horn. Clinically relevant (10μM) and a very high concentration of pregabalin (100μM) did not affect the intensity or spread of dorsal root stimulation-evoked Ca(2+) signals, whereas an extremely high dose of pregabalin (300μM) slightly but significantly attenuated Ca(2+) signals in normal rats and in diabetic neuropathic (DN) rats. There was no difference between normal rats and DN rats with regard to the extent of signal attenuation at all concentrations tested. These results suggest that the activity of dorsal horn neurons in the spinal cord is not inhibited acutely by clinical doses of pregabalin under normal or DN conditions. It is very unlikely that an acute inhibitory action in the dorsal horn is the main analgesic mechanism of pregabalin in neuropathic pain states.
普瑞巴林被认为通过与电压门控钙(Ca(2+))通道的α2δ-1亚基结合,在神经性疼痛中发挥其治疗作用。然而,其与α2δ-1亚基结合后的确切镇痛机制仍不清楚。普瑞巴林的临床浓度(约10μM)是否能急性抑制脊髓背角神经元存在争议。为了解决这个问题,我们使用带有完整L5背根的脊髓切片进行细胞内Ca(2+)成像研究,并检查普瑞巴林是否能急性抑制正常大鼠和链脲佐菌素诱导的疼痛性糖尿病神经病变大鼠的初级传入刺激诱发的背角神经元兴奋。在正常情况下,刺激背根主要在浅表背角诱发Ca(2+)信号。临床相关浓度(10μM)和非常高浓度的普瑞巴林(100μM)不影响背根刺激诱发的Ca(2+)信号的强度或扩散,而极高剂量的普瑞巴林(300μM)在正常大鼠和糖尿病神经病变(DN)大鼠中轻微但显著减弱Ca(2+)信号。在所有测试浓度下,正常大鼠和DN大鼠之间的信号减弱程度没有差异。这些结果表明,在正常或DN条件下,临床剂量的普瑞巴林不会急性抑制脊髓背角神经元的活动。背角的急性抑制作用极不可能是普瑞巴林在神经性疼痛状态下的主要镇痛机制。