Anesthesia and Critical Care Department
Anesthesia and Critical Care Department.
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):284-96. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew266.
Since 1968, when Baxter and Shires developed the Parkland formula, little progress has been made in the field of fluid therapy for burn resuscitation, despite advances in haemodynamic monitoring, establishment of the 'goal-directed therapy' concept, and the development of new colloid and crystalloid solutions. Burn patients receive a larger amount of fluids in the first hours than any other trauma patients. Initial resuscitation is based on crystalloids because of the increased capillary permeability occurring during the first 24 h. After that time, some colloids, but not all, are accepted. Since the emergence of the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee alert from the European Medicines Agency concerning hydroxyethyl starches, solutions containing this component are not recommended for burns. But the question is: what do we really know about fluid resuscitation in burns? To provide an answer, we carried out a non-systematic review to clarify how to quantify the amount of fluids needed, what the current evidence says about the available solutions, and which solution is the most appropriate for burn patients based on the available knowledge.
自 1968 年 Baxter 和 Shires 提出 Parkland 公式以来,尽管在血流动力学监测、“目标导向治疗”概念的建立以及新型胶体和晶体溶液的开发方面取得了进展,但烧伤复苏领域的液体治疗几乎没有取得进展。烧伤患者在最初的几个小时内接受的液体量比任何其他创伤患者都要多。由于在最初的 24 小时内发生毛细血管通透性增加,初始复苏是基于晶体液。在此之后,一些胶体液,但不是所有胶体液,是可以接受的。自从欧洲药品管理局药物警戒风险评估委员会发出羟乙基淀粉警报以来,含有该成分的溶液不建议用于烧伤。但是问题是:我们对烧伤的液体复苏到底了解多少?为了提供答案,我们进行了一项非系统性综述,以阐明如何量化所需的液体量、关于现有溶液的现有证据是什么,以及基于现有知识,哪种溶液最适合烧伤患者。