• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根治性放化疗治疗头颈部鳞状细胞癌:顺铂与卡铂?一项荟萃分析。

Definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous head and neck cancer: cisplatin versus carboplatin? A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Johns Hopkins Singapore, City of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Future Oncol. 2016 Dec;12(23):2755-2764. doi: 10.2217/fon-2016-0068. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

DOI:10.2217/fon-2016-0068
PMID:27549331
Abstract

AIM

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy (with cisplatin or carboplatin) is an option of definitive treatment for squamous head and neck cancer. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis comparing those two platinum agents.

MATERIALS & METHODS: We carried out a systematic search on English literature between 1990 and 17 April 2015 according to the Cochrane review guidelines.

RESULTS

Five of 60 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria with 491 patients. There was no difference in response rate. Cisplatin tends to be more active systemically than carboplatin, without statistically significance; 5-year survival rate: 30 and 27%, respectively (p = 0.33).

CONCLUSION

Despite the trend to improved outcomes in using cisplatin, carboplatin is also active and can be a reasonable option to treat patients.

摘要

目的

顺铂或卡铂联合放化疗是头颈部鳞癌确定性治疗的选择之一。本研究旨在进行荟萃分析以比较这两种铂类药物。

材料与方法

我们根据 Cochrane 综述指南对 1990 年至 2015 年 4 月 17 日期间的英文文献进行了系统检索。

结果

60 项研究中有 5 项符合纳入标准,共纳入 491 例患者。两组患者的缓解率无差异。顺铂的全身活性优于卡铂,但差异无统计学意义;5 年生存率:分别为 30%和 27%(p = 0.33)。

结论

尽管使用顺铂的治疗结果有改善趋势,但卡铂也具有活性,是治疗患者的合理选择。

相似文献

1
Definitive chemoradiotherapy for squamous head and neck cancer: cisplatin versus carboplatin? A meta-analysis.根治性放化疗治疗头颈部鳞状细胞癌:顺铂与卡铂?一项荟萃分析。
Future Oncol. 2016 Dec;12(23):2755-2764. doi: 10.2217/fon-2016-0068. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
2
Definitive chemoradiotherapy with carboplatin for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.采用卡铂进行的头颈部鳞状细胞癌根治性放化疗。
Laryngoscope. 2017 Oct;127(10):2260-2264. doi: 10.1002/lary.26554. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
3
Induction Chemotherapy and Sequential Concomitant Chemo-radiation in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers: How Induction-phase Intensity and Treatment Breaks May Impact on Clinical Outcomes.局部晚期头颈癌的诱导化疗及序贯同步放化疗:诱导期强度和治疗中断如何影响临床结局
Anticancer Res. 2015 Nov;35(11):6247-54.
4
Prospective Study of Cetuximab, Carboplatin, and Radiation Therapy for Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer Unfit for Cisplatin.局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌不适合顺铂患者的西妥昔单抗、卡铂和放射治疗的前瞻性研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jul 15;98(4):948-954. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.088. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
5
Weekly Low-Dose Versus Three-Weekly High-Dose Cisplatin for Concurrent Chemoradiation in Locoregionally Advanced Non-Nasopharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Aggregate Data.局部晚期非鼻咽癌头颈部癌同期放化疗中每周低剂量与三周高剂量顺铂的比较:汇总数据分析的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oncologist. 2017 Sep;22(9):1056-1066. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0015. Epub 2017 May 22.
6
TPF induction chemotherapy and concomitant irradiation with cisplatin and cetuximab in unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.TPF诱导化疗联合顺铂和西妥昔单抗同步放疗用于不可切除的头颈部鳞状细胞癌
Head Neck. 2014 Nov;36(11):1555-61. doi: 10.1002/hed.23506. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
7
A planned neck dissection is not necessary in all patients with N2-3 head-and-neck cancer after sequential chemoradiotherapy.在序贯放化疗后,并非所有 N2-3 头颈部癌患者都需要计划行颈部清扫术。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jul 1;83(3):994-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.07.042. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
8
Randomized phase II trial of concomitant chemoradiotherapy using weekly carboplatin or daily low-dose cisplatin for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.每周使用卡铂或每日低剂量顺铂同步放化疗治疗头颈部鳞状细胞癌的随机II期试验。
Cancer J. 2004 Sep-Oct;10(5):326-32. doi: 10.1097/00130404-200409000-00010.
9
Weekly versus every-three-weeks platinum-based chemoradiation regimens for head and neck cancer.头颈部癌铂类同步放化疗方案:每周一次与每三周一次的对比
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Nov 24;45(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40463-016-0175-x.
10
Concurrent cetuximab versus platinum-based chemoradiation for the definitive treatment of locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer.西妥昔单抗与铂类同步放化疗用于局部晚期头颈癌的根治性治疗
Head Neck. 2015 Mar;37(3):386-92. doi: 10.1002/hed.23609. Epub 2014 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of prehabilitation in HNSCC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.放化疗治疗头颈部鳞癌患者的预康复作用。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Sep 5;32(10):638. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08834-3.
2
Chemoradiation with Cisplatin vs. Carboplatin for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN).顺铂与卡铂用于头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCCHN)的同步放化疗对比
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;15(13):3278. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133278.
3
Prognostic Impact of Sarcopenia's Occurrence during Radiotherapy in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients.
口咽癌患者放疗期间肌肉减少症发生的预后影响
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 24;15(3):723. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030723.
4
Genotoxicity of cisplatin and carboplatin in cultured human lymphocytes: a comparative study.顺铂和卡铂对培养的人淋巴细胞的遗传毒性:一项比较研究。
Interdiscip Toxicol. 2019 Oct;12(2):93-97. doi: 10.2478/intox-2019-0011. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
Comparing high-dose cisplatin with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in definitive concurrent chemoradiation setting for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC).比较高剂量顺铂与顺铂为基础的联合化疗在局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(LAHNSCC)根治性同期放化疗中的应用。
Cancer Med. 2019 Jun;8(6):2730-2739. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2139. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
6
Chemoradiation-induced hearing loss remains a major concern for head and neck cancer patients.放化疗引起的听力损失仍是头颈癌患者的一个主要担忧。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Sep;57(sup4):S49-S54. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1353710. Epub 2017 Jul 20.