Suppr超能文献

排球拦网后与前交叉韧带损伤风险相关的落地类型识别。

Identification of types of landings after blocking in volleyball associated with risk of ACL injury.

作者信息

Zahradnik David, Jandacka Daniel, Farana Roman, Uchytil Jaroslav, Hamill Joseph

机构信息

a Human Motion Diagnostic Center , University of Ostrava , Ostrava , Czech Republic.

b Biomechanics Laboratory , University of Massachusetts , Amherst , MA , USA.

出版信息

Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 Mar;17(2):241-248. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2016.1220626. Epub 2016 Aug 22.

Abstract

Landing with a low knee flexion angle after volleyball block jumps may be associated with an increased risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The aim of the present study was to identify the types of volleyball landings after blocks where the knee flexion angle is found to be under a critical knee flexion angle value of 30° at the instant of the first peak of the ground reaction force (GRF). Synchronized kinematic and kinetic data were collected for each trial. T-tests were used to determine if each knee flexion angle at the instant of the peak GRF was significantly different from the critical value of 30°. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare knee flexion angle, time to first peak and the magnitude of the first peak of the resultant GRF and knee stiffness. Significantly lower knee flexion angles were found in the "go" landing (p = .01, ES = 0.6) and the "reverse" landing (p = .02, ES = 0.6) only. The results for knee flexion angle and GRF parameters indicated a significant difference between a "reverse" and "go" and other types of landings, except the "side stick" landing for GRF. The "reverse" and "go" landings may present a risk for ACL injury due to the single-leg landing of these activities that have an associated mediolateral movement.

摘要

排球拦网起跳后以较小的膝关节屈曲角度落地,可能会增加前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的风险。本研究的目的是确定拦网后排球落地的类型,即在地面对地反应力(GRF)的第一个峰值瞬间,膝关节屈曲角度低于30°这一临界膝关节屈曲角度值。每次试验均收集同步的运动学和动力学数据。采用t检验来确定GRF峰值瞬间的每个膝关节屈曲角度是否与30°的临界值有显著差异。采用重复测量方差分析来比较膝关节屈曲角度、到达第一个峰值的时间、合成GRF的第一个峰值大小以及膝关节刚度。仅在“前冲”落地(p = 0.01,效应量= 0.6)和“反向”落地(p = 0.02,效应量= 0.6)中发现膝关节屈曲角度显著更低。膝关节屈曲角度和GRF参数的结果表明,“反向”和“前冲”落地与其他类型的落地之间存在显著差异,但GRF方面“侧撑”落地除外。“反向”和“前冲”落地可能会因这些活动的单腿落地伴有内外侧运动而带来ACL损伤风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验