Bradbury Angela R, Patrick-Miller Linda, Schwartz Lisa A, Egleston Brian L, Henry-Moss Dare, Domchek Susan M, Daly Mary B, Tuchman Lisa, Moore Cynthia, Rauch Paula K, Shorter Rebecca, Karpink Kelsey, Sands Colleen Burke
Angela R. Bradbury, Lisa A. Schwartz, Dare Henry-Moss, Susan M. Domchek, Rebecca Shorter, Kelsey Karpink, and Colleen Burke Sands, The Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania; Lisa A. Schwartz, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Brian L. Egleston and Mary B. Daly, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Susan M. Domchek, The Basser Research Center for BRCA in the Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Linda Patrick-Miller, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Lisa Tuchman, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC; and Cynthia Moore and Paula K. Rauch, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct 1;34(28):3409-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.3450. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
To evaluate the impact of breast cancer family history and maternal BRCA1/2 mutation on the psychosocial adjustment and perceived risk in girls age 11 to 19 years old.
Girls age 11 to 19 years old with one or more relatives with breast cancer or a familial BRCA1/2 mutation (breast cancer family history [BCFH] positive, n = 208; n = 69 with BRCA1/2-positive mother), peers (BCFH negative, n = 112), and their mothers completed assessments of psychosocial adjustment, breast cancer-specific distress, and perceived risk of breast cancer.
General psychosocial adjustment did not differ significantly between BCFH-positive and BCFH-negative girls, either by self-report or mother report, except for higher self-esteem among BCFH-positive girls (P = .01). BCFH-positive girls had higher breast cancer-specific distress than BCFH-negative girls (P < .001), but girls from BRCA1/2-positive families did not differ from other BCFH-positive peers. BCFH-positive girls were more likely to report themselves at increased self-risk for breast cancer in adulthood than BCFH-negative peers (74% v 33%, respectively; P ≤ .001). Girls from BRCA1/2-positive families were more likely than other BCFH-positive and BCFH-negative peers to report themselves at increased risk (P < .001). In all groups, perceived risk of breast cancer was associated with older age. Higher breast cancer-specific distress among adolescent girls was associated with higher self-perceived risk of breast cancer and higher maternal breast cancer-specific distress.
Adolescent girls from BRCA1/2-positive and breast cancer families have higher self-esteem and do not have poorer psychosocial adjustment than peers. However, they do experience greater breast cancer-specific distress and perceived risk of breast cancer, particularly among older girls. Understanding the impact is important to optimize responses to growing up in families at familial and genetic risk for breast cancer, particularly given the debate over the genetic testing of children for cancer susceptibility in adulthood.
评估乳腺癌家族史和母亲BRCA1/2基因突变对11至19岁女孩心理社会适应及感知风险的影响。
11至19岁、有一名或多名亲属患乳腺癌或有家族性BRCA1/2基因突变的女孩(乳腺癌家族史[BCFH]阳性,n = 208;BRCA1/2阳性母亲的女孩,n = 69)、同龄人(BCFH阴性,n = 112)及其母亲完成了心理社会适应、乳腺癌特异性困扰及乳腺癌感知风险的评估。
BCFH阳性和BCFH阴性女孩在一般心理社会适应方面,无论是自我报告还是母亲报告,均无显著差异,但BCFH阳性女孩的自尊水平较高(P = 0.01)。BCFH阳性女孩的乳腺癌特异性困扰高于BCFH阴性女孩(P < 0.001),但来自BRCA1/2阳性家庭的女孩与其他BCFH阳性同龄人无差异。BCFH阳性女孩比BCFH阴性同龄人更有可能报告自己成年后患乳腺癌的自身风险增加(分别为74%对33%;P≤0.001)。来自BRCA1/2阳性家庭的女孩比其他BCFH阳性和BCFH阴性同龄人更有可能报告自己风险增加(P < 0.001)。在所有组中,乳腺癌感知风险与年龄较大有关。青春期女孩较高的乳腺癌特异性困扰与较高的自我感知乳腺癌风险及较高的母亲乳腺癌特异性困扰有关。
来自BRCA1/2阳性和乳腺癌家族的青春期女孩有较高的自尊,心理社会适应并不比同龄人差。然而,她们确实经历了更大的乳腺癌特异性困扰和乳腺癌感知风险,尤其是年龄较大的女孩。了解这种影响对于优化对处于乳腺癌家族和遗传风险家庭中成长的应对措施很重要,特别是考虑到关于儿童成年后患癌易感性基因检测的争论。