Marchewka Artur, Wypych Marek, Michałowski Jarosław M, Sińczuk Marcin, Wordecha Małgorzata, Jednoróg Katarzyna, Nowicka Anna
Laboratory of Brain Imaging, Neurobiology Centre, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology - Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw, Poland.
Faculty of Psychology, Warsaw University Warsaw, Poland.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Aug 8;10:378. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00378. eCollection 2016.
Studies presenting memory-facilitating effect of emotions typically focused on affective dimensions of arousal and valence. Little is known, however, about the extent to which stimulus-driven basic emotions could have distinct effects on memory. In the present paper we sought to examine the modulatory effect of disgust, fear, and sadness on intentional remembering and forgetting using widely used item-method directed forgetting (DF) paradigm. Eighteen women underwent fMRI scanning during encoding phase in which they were asked either to remember (R) or to forget (F) pictures. In the test phase all previously used stimuli were re-presented together with the same number of new pictures and participants had to categorize them as old or new, irrespective of the F/R instruction. On the behavioral level we found a typical DF effect, i.e., higher recognition rates for to-be-remembered (TBR) items than to-be-forgotten (TBF) ones for both neutral and emotional categories. Emotional stimuli had higher recognition rate than neutral ones, while among emotional those eliciting disgust produced highest recognition, but at the same time induced more false alarms. Therefore, when false alarm corrected recognition was examined the DF effect was equally strong irrespective of emotion. Additionally, even though subjects rated disgusting pictures as more arousing and negative than other picture categories, logistic regression on the item level showed that the effect of disgust on recognition memory was stronger than the effect of arousal or valence. On the neural level, ROI analyses (with valence and arousal covariates) revealed that correctly recognized disgusting stimuli evoked the highest activity in the left amygdala compared to all other categories. This structure was also more activated for remembered vs. forgotten stimuli, but only in case of disgust or fear eliciting pictures. Our findings, despite several limitations, suggest that disgust have a special salience in memory relative to other negative emotions, which cannot be put down to differences in arousal or valence. The current results thereby support the suggestion that a purely dimensional model of emotional influences on cognition might not be adequate to account for observed effects.
那些呈现出情绪对记忆有促进作用的研究通常聚焦于唤醒和效价的情感维度。然而,对于刺激驱动的基本情绪在多大程度上会对记忆产生不同影响,我们却知之甚少。在本文中,我们试图运用广泛使用的项目法定向遗忘(DF)范式,来检验厌恶、恐惧和悲伤对有意记忆和遗忘的调节作用。18名女性在编码阶段接受功能磁共振成像扫描,在此阶段她们被要求要么记住(R)要么忘记(F)图片。在测试阶段,所有之前呈现过的刺激与相同数量的新图片一起再次呈现,参与者必须将它们归类为旧的或新的,而不考虑F/R指令。在行为层面,我们发现了典型的DF效应,即对于中性和情感类别,需记住(TBR)项目的识别率高于需遗忘(TBF)项目。情感刺激的识别率高于中性刺激,而在情感刺激中,引发厌恶的刺激产生的识别率最高,但同时也引发了更多的错误警报。因此,当对校正错误警报后的识别进行检验时,无论情绪如何,DF效应同样强烈。此外,尽管受试者将令人厌恶的图片评为比其他图片类别更具唤醒性和负面性,但在项目层面的逻辑回归显示,厌恶对识别记忆的影响比对唤醒或效价的影响更强。在神经层面,感兴趣区分析(有价差和唤醒协变量)显示,与所有其他类别相比,正确识别的令人厌恶的刺激在左杏仁核中引发的活动最高。对于记住的与遗忘的刺激,该结构也有更多激活,但仅在引发厌恶或恐惧的图片情况下如此。我们的研究结果尽管存在一些局限性,但表明厌恶相对于其他负面情绪在记忆中具有特殊的显著性,这不能归因于唤醒或效价的差异。当前结果因此支持了这样一种观点,即情绪对认知影响的纯粹维度模型可能不足以解释观察到的效应。