Mayne A S, Christie G W, Smaill B H, Hunter P J, Barratt-Boyes B G
Department of Physiology, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989 Aug;98(2):170-80.
The aim of this study was to determine whether second-generation porcine bioprostheses, glutaraldehyde fixed at pressures said to be less than 4 mm Hg, exhibit more natural leaflet material properties than earlier valves fixed at 80 to 100 mm Hg. Biaxial mechanical testing techniques were used to compare Carpentier-Edwards SAV, St. Jude Medical BioImplant, Hancock II, and Medtronic Intact bioprostheses (12 leaflets from four valves in each case) with fresh porcine aortic valves and high pressure-fixed Carpentier-Edwards 6625 bioprostheses (14 leaflets from five valves in each case). The circumferential extensibility of leaflets from Medtronic Intact bioprostheses and from fresh porcine aortic valves were not significantly different (p greater than 0.05), whereas leaflets from the other second-generation valves tested and from Carpentier-Edwards 6625 valves were highly inextensible in the circumferential direction. The radial material properties of leaflets from all bioprostheses differed from those of fresh porcine aortic valves, which were very extensible with a high pretransitional compliance. The radial extensibility and compliance of Hancock II, St. Jude Medical BioImplant, and Carpentier-Edwards 6625 leaflets were not significantly different (p greater than 0.05). In the radial direction, Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Medtronic Intact valve leaflets were substantially more extensible than Carpentier-Edwards 6625 leaflets (p less than 0.01), whereas Medtronic Intact leaflets were more compliant than all other bioprostheses. These data demonstrate (1) that second-generation porcine bioprosthetic valves do not necessarily exhibit more natural leaflet material properties than earlier high pressure-fixed xenografts and (2) that Medtronic Intact valve leaflets have material properties most closely approximating the fresh porcine aortic valve.
本研究的目的是确定在据称小于4毫米汞柱的压力下戊二醛固定的第二代猪生物瓣膜,与在80至100毫米汞柱压力下固定的早期瓣膜相比,是否展现出更接近天然瓣叶的材料特性。采用双轴力学测试技术,将Carpentier-Edwards SAV、圣犹达医疗生物植入物、Hancock II和美敦力Integrity生物瓣膜(每种情况下来自四个瓣膜的12个瓣叶)与新鲜猪主动脉瓣以及高压固定的Carpentier-Edwards 6625生物瓣膜(每种情况下来自五个瓣膜的14个瓣叶)进行比较。美敦力Integrity生物瓣膜瓣叶和新鲜猪主动脉瓣瓣叶的周向伸展性无显著差异(p大于0.05),而测试的其他第二代瓣膜瓣叶以及Carpentier-Edwards 6625瓣膜瓣叶在周向方向上高度不可伸展。所有生物瓣膜瓣叶的径向材料特性均与新鲜猪主动脉瓣不同,新鲜猪主动脉瓣非常易于伸展且具有较高的转变前顺应性。Hancock II、圣犹达医疗生物植入物和Carpentier-Edwards 6625瓣叶的径向伸展性和顺应性无显著差异(p大于0.05)。在径向方向上,Carpentier-Edwards SAV和美敦力Integrity瓣膜瓣叶比Carpentier-Edwards 6625瓣叶更易于伸展(p小于0.01),而美敦力Integrity瓣叶比所有其他生物瓣膜更具顺应性。这些数据表明:(1)第二代猪生物瓣膜不一定比早期高压固定的异种移植物展现出更接近天然瓣叶的材料特性;(2)美敦力Integrity瓣膜瓣叶的材料特性最接近新鲜猪主动脉瓣。