Mease Philip J, van der Heijde Désirée, Ritchlin Christopher T, Okada Masato, Cuchacovich Raquel S, Shuler Catherine L, Lin Chen-Yen, Braun Daniel K, Lee Chin H, Gladman Dafna D
Department of Rheumatology, Swedish Medical Center, and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):79-87. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209709. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
To assess the safety and efficacy of ixekizumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin-17A, in a double-blind phase III trial enrolling patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
Patients naive to biologic therapy with active PsA were randomised to subcutaneous injections of placebo (N=106), adalimumab 40 mg once every 2 weeks (active reference; N=101), ixekizumab 80 mg once every 2 weeks (IXEQ2W) (N=103), or ixekizumab 80 mg once every 4 weeks (IXEQ4W) (N=107). Both ixekizumab regimens included a 160-mg starting dose. The primary objective was to assess the superiority of IXEQ2W or IXEQ4W versus placebo as measured by the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response at week 24.
Significantly more patients treated with ixekizumab achieved an ACR20 response with IXEQ2W (62.1%) or IXEQ4W (57.9%) than placebo (30.2%) (p≤0.001; non-responder imputation method). Disease activity and functional disability were significantly improved with both ixekizumab doses versus placebo at weeks 12 and 24, and there was significantly less progression of structural damage at week 24 (p≤0.01). Clearance of plaque psoriasis was greater with ixekizumab than placebo (p≤0.001). Efficacy results with adalimumab, the active reference arm, showed significant improvements versus placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events were more frequent with ixekizumab (65.7-66.4%) and adalimumab (64.4%) than placebo (47.2%) (p<0.05).
In biologic-naive patients with active PsA, ixekizumab treatment resulted in improvements in disease activity and physical function, as well as in the inhibition of structural damage progression. Overall, adverse events were more frequent in all active groups compared with placebo.
NCT01695239; EudraCT2011-002326-49; Results.
在一项纳入活动性银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者的双盲III期试验中,评估抑制白细胞介素-17A的单克隆抗体司库奇尤单抗的安全性和有效性。
对未接受过生物治疗的活动性PsA患者进行随机分组,皮下注射安慰剂(N = 106)、每2周一次注射40 mg阿达木单抗(活性对照;N = 101)、每2周一次注射80 mg司库奇尤单抗(IXEQ2W)(N = 103)或每4周一次注射80 mg司库奇尤单抗(IXEQ4W)(N = 107)。两种司库奇尤单抗治疗方案均包括160 mg的起始剂量。主要目标是通过在第24周时达到美国风湿病学会20(ACR20)反应的患者比例,评估IXEQ2W或IXEQ4W相对于安慰剂的优越性。
与安慰剂组(30.2%)相比,接受司库奇尤单抗治疗的患者中,采用IXEQ2W方案(62.1%)或IXEQ4W方案(57.9%)达到ACR20反应的患者显著更多(p≤0.001;无反应者推算方法)。在第12周和第24周时,与安慰剂相比,两种司库奇尤单抗剂量均显著改善了疾病活动度和功能残疾,并且在第24周时结构损伤进展显著更少(p≤0.01)。与安慰剂相比,司库奇尤单抗使斑块状银屑病的清除率更高(p≤0.001)。活性对照组阿达木单抗的疗效结果显示与安慰剂相比有显著改善。司库奇尤单抗(65.7 - 66.4%)和阿达木单抗(64.4%)治疗中出现的不良事件比安慰剂(47.2%)更频繁(p<0.05)。
在未接受过生物治疗的活动性PsA患者中,司库奇尤单抗治疗可改善疾病活动度和身体功能,并抑制结构损伤进展。总体而言,与安慰剂相比,所有活性治疗组的不良事件更频繁。
NCT01695239;EudraCT2011 - 002326 - 49;结果 。