Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Rheumatology University Hospital and Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology, Branch for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology and Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence for Immune-Mediated Diseases, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Lancet. 2020 May 9;395(10235):1496-1505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30564-X.
Head-to-head trials in psoriatic arthritis are helpful in guiding clinical decision making. The EXCEED study evaluated the efficacy and safety of secukinumab versus adalimumab as first-line biological monotherapy for 52 weeks in patients with active psoriatic arthritis, with a musculoskeletal primary endpoint of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response.
This parallel-group, double-blind, active-controlled, phase-3b, multicentre (168 sites in 26 countries) trial enrolled patients aged at least 18 years with active psoriatic arthritis. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by means of interactive response technology to receive secukinumab or adalimumab. Patients, investigators, site personnel, and those doing the assessments (except independent study drug administrators) were masked to study assignment. 300 mg secukinumab was administered subcutaneously at baseline, weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4, and then every 4 weeks until week 48 as a pre-filled syringe. Adalimumab was administered every 2 weeks from baseline until week 50 as 40 mg per 0·4 mL citrate free subcutaneous injection. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with at least 20% improvement in the ACR response criteria (ACR20) at week 52. Patients were analysed according to the treatment to which they were randomly assigned. Safety analyses included all safety data reported up to and including the week 52 visit for each patient who received at least one dose of study drug. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02745080.
Between April 3, 2017 and Aug 23, 2018, we randomly assigned 853 patients to receive secukinumab (n=426) or adalimumab (n=427). 709 (83%) of 853 patients completed week 52 of the study, of whom 691 (81%) received the last study treatment at week 50. 61 (14%) of 426 patients in the secukinumab group discontinued treatment by week 52 versus 101 (24%) of 427 patients in the adalimumab group. The primary endpoint of superiority of secukinumab versus adalimumab for ACR20 response at week 52 was not met. 67% of patients in the secukinumab group achieved an ACR20 response at week 52 versus 62% of patients in the adalimumab group (OR 1·30, 95% CI 0·98-1·72; p=0·0719). The safety profiles of secukinumab and adalimumab were consistent with previous reports. Seven (2%) of 426 patients in the secukinumab group and six (1%) of 427 patients in the adalimumab group had serious infections. One death was reported in the secukinumab group due to colon cancer and was assessed as not related to the study drug by the investigator.
Secukinumab did not meet statistical significance for superiority versus adalimumab in the primary endpoint of ACR20 response at week 52. However, secukinumab was associated with a higher treatment retention rate than adalimumab. This study provides comparative data on two biological agents with different mechanisms of action, which could help guide clinical decision making in the management of patients with psoriatic arthritis.
Novartis Pharma.
在银屑病关节炎中进行头对头试验有助于指导临床决策。EXCEED 研究评估了司库奇尤单抗与阿达木单抗作为生物一线单药治疗活动性银屑病关节炎患者的疗效和安全性,主要肌肉骨骼终点为美国风湿病学会(ACR)20 应答。
这项平行组、双盲、主动对照、3b 期、多中心(来自 26 个国家的 168 个地点)试验纳入了年龄至少 18 岁的活动性银屑病关节炎患者。符合条件的患者通过交互式反应技术以 1:1 的比例随机分配接受司库奇尤单抗或阿达木单抗治疗。患者、研究者、现场工作人员和进行评估的人员(除了独立的研究药物管理员)对研究分组均设盲。司库奇尤单抗在基线时、第 1、2、3 和 4 周以及第 48 周前每 4 周皮下注射 300mg,为预充式注射器。阿达木单抗从基线开始每 2 周给药一次,直到第 50 周,每次给药 0·4mL 无柠檬酸赋形剂的 40mg 皮下注射。主要终点是在第 52 周时达到 ACR20 应答标准(ACR20)至少 20%改善的患者比例。患者按照随机分配的治疗方案进行分析。安全性分析包括每位接受至少一剂研究药物的患者截至第 52 周访视的所有安全性数据。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT02745080。
在 2017 年 4 月 3 日至 2018 年 8 月 23 日期间,我们随机分配 853 名患者接受司库奇尤单抗(n=426)或阿达木单抗(n=427)治疗。853 名患者中,709 名(83%)完成了第 52 周的研究,其中 691 名(81%)在第 50 周接受了最后一次研究治疗。司库奇尤单抗组中有 61 名(14%)患者在第 52 周停止治疗,而阿达木单抗组中有 101 名(24%)患者停止治疗。司库奇尤单抗组在第 52 周时 ACR20 应答的优越性主要终点未达到。司库奇尤单抗组有 67%的患者在第 52 周时达到 ACR20 应答,阿达木单抗组有 62%的患者达到 ACR20 应答(OR 1·30,95%CI 0·98-1·72;p=0·0719)。司库奇尤单抗和阿达木单抗的安全性特征与之前的报告一致。司库奇尤单抗组有 7 名(2%)患者和阿达木单抗组有 6 名(1%)患者发生严重感染。司库奇尤单抗组有 1 例死亡病例,归因于结肠癌,研究者评估与研究药物无关。
在第 52 周时,司库奇尤单抗在 ACR20 应答的主要终点上未达到优于阿达木单抗的统计学意义。然而,司库奇尤单抗与阿达木单抗相比,治疗保留率更高。这项研究提供了两种具有不同作用机制的生物制剂的比较数据,这可能有助于指导银屑病关节炎患者管理的临床决策。
诺华制药。