Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌患者软脑膜癌病的最佳管理——一项系统评价

Optimal Management of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis in Breast Cancer Patients-A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Dudani Shaan, Mazzarello Sasha, Hilton John, Hutton Brian, Vandermeer Lisa, Fernandes Ricardo, Ibrahim Mohammed F K, Smith Stephanie, Majeed Habeeb, Al-Baimani Khalid, Caudrelier Jean-Michel, Shorr Risa, Clemons Mark

机构信息

Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Clin Breast Cancer. 2016 Dec;16(6):456-470. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

Abstract

The incidence of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer patients (LC-BC) is increasing. Despite significantly affecting patient quality of life (QoL) and overall survival (OS), little is known about its optimal management. A systematic review of treatment strategies for LC-BC was performed. EMBASE, Ovid Medline, Pubmed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1946 to 2015 for trials reporting on treatments for LC-BC. All treatment modalities and study types were considered. The outcome measures of interest included OS, time to neurologic progression (TTNP), QoL, and treatment toxicity. Of 718 unique citations, 173 studies met the prespecified eligibility criteria. Most were not specific to LC-BC patients. Of 4 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 was specific to LC-BC patients and compared systemic therapy and involved-field radiotherapy with or without intrathecal (IT) methotrexate (35 patients), and the remaining 3 had compared different IT chemotherapy regimens (58 of 157 with LC-BC). Of the remaining studies, 19 were nonrandomized interventional studies (225 LC-BC patients), 148 were observational studies (3230 LC-BC patients), and 2 systematic reviews. Minimal prospective data were available on OS, TTNP, QoL, and toxicity. Owing to study heterogeneity, meta-analyses of the endpoint data could not be performed. Limited high-quality evidence exists regarding optimal treatment of LC-BC. The identified studies were heterogeneous and often methodologically poor. The only RCT that specifically assessed the role of IT chemotherapy showed no benefit, and, if anything, harm. Further prospective, tumor-specific trials with improved interstudy methodologic consistency and transparently reported data on OS, TTNP, QoL, and toxicity are urgently needed.

摘要

乳腺癌患者软脑膜癌病(LC-BC)的发病率正在上升。尽管它对患者的生活质量(QoL)和总生存期(OS)有显著影响,但对其最佳治疗方法却知之甚少。我们对LC-BC的治疗策略进行了系统评价。检索了1946年至2015年期间的EMBASE、Ovid Medline、Pubmed以及Cochrane对照试验中央注册库,以查找关于LC-BC治疗的试验报告。考虑了所有治疗方式和研究类型。感兴趣的结局指标包括总生存期、至神经学进展时间(TTNP)、生活质量和治疗毒性。在718条独特的参考文献中,有173项研究符合预先设定的纳入标准。大多数研究并非专门针对LC-BC患者。在4项已确定的随机对照试验(RCT)中,1项专门针对LC-BC患者,比较了全身治疗和累及野放疗联合或不联合鞘内注射(IT)甲氨蝶呤(35例患者),其余3项比较了不同的IT化疗方案(157例LC-BC患者中的58例)。在其余研究中,19项为非随机干预性研究(225例LC-BC患者),148项为观察性研究(3230例LC-BC患者),以及2项系统评价。关于总生存期、至神经学进展时间、生活质量和毒性的前瞻性数据极少。由于研究的异质性,无法对终点数据进行荟萃分析。关于LC-BC的最佳治疗,存在的高质量证据有限。已确定的研究具有异质性,且在方法学上往往较差。唯一一项专门评估IT化疗作用的RCT未显示出益处,甚至可能有害。迫切需要开展进一步的前瞻性、针对肿瘤的试验,提高研究间方法学的一致性,并透明地报告关于总生存期、至神经学进展时间、生活质量和毒性的数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验