Akhtar Shamsuddin, Liu Jia, Heng Joseph, Dai Feng, Schonberger Robert B, Burg Matthew M
Department of Anesthesiology and Pharmacology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Department of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Sep;33:208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 May 3.
It is recommended to correct intravenous induction doses by up to 50% for patients older than 65 years. The objectives were to determine (a) the degree to which anesthesia providers correct induction doses for age and (b) additionally adjust for American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA-PS) class (severity of illness) and (c) whether postinduction hypotension is more common among patients aged >65.
Retrospective chart review.
Academic medical center.
A total of 1869 adult patients receiving general anesthesia for GI surgical procedures from February 2013 to January 2014.
Patients were divided into 3 age groups (age <65, 65-79, ≥80 years) and then further stratified into ASA-PS class (I/II vs III/IV). Multiple pairwise comparisons were conducted using Welch t tests for continuous variables to determine whether dosing was different for the older groups vs the younger group; separate analyses were performed within and across ASA-PS class. This approach was also used to determine differences in mean arterial pressure change in the older groups vs the younger group, whereas the rates of hypotension among different age groups were compared by Cochran-Armitage trend test.
No significant decrease in dosing between age groups was observed for fentanyl and midazolam. For propofol, there was a significantly lower dosing for older patients: 17% for patients aged 65-79 and 29% for those aged >80, which was still in less than the recommendations. An inverse relationship was observed between propofol dosing and ASA-PS class, but no consistent relationship was noted for fentanyl and midazolam. There were a significantly larger drop in mean arterial pressure and a greater likelihood of hypotension following induction in patients aged 65-79 years and >80 years as compared with those aged <65 years.
This study shows that the administered dose of anesthetic induction agents is significantly higher than that recommended for patients older than 65 years. This failure to age-adjust dose may contribute to hypotensive episodes.
建议对65岁以上患者的静脉诱导剂量最多校正50%。目的是确定:(a)麻醉提供者根据年龄校正诱导剂量的程度;(b)此外根据美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)分级(疾病严重程度)进行调整;(c)诱导后低血压在65岁以上患者中是否更常见。
回顾性病历审查。
学术医疗中心。
2013年2月至2014年1月期间接受胃肠道手术全身麻醉的1869例成年患者。
患者分为3个年龄组(年龄<65岁、65 - 79岁、≥80岁),然后进一步分层为ASA-PS分级(I/II级与III/IV级)。对连续变量使用韦尔奇t检验进行多次成对比较,以确定老年组与年轻组的给药剂量是否不同;在ASA-PS分级内和分级间分别进行分析。该方法还用于确定老年组与年轻组平均动脉压变化的差异,而不同年龄组低血压发生率通过 Cochr an - Armitage趋势检验进行比较。
对于芬太尼和咪达唑仑,未观察到年龄组之间给药剂量有显著降低。对于丙泊酚,老年患者的给药剂量显著更低:65 - 79岁患者为17%,80岁以上患者为29%,仍低于推荐剂量。观察到丙泊酚给药剂量与ASA-PS分级呈负相关,但芬太尼和咪达唑仑未发现一致关系。与<65岁患者相比,65 - 79岁和80岁以上患者诱导后平均动脉压下降幅度显著更大,低血压可能性更高。
本研究表明,麻醉诱导药物的给药剂量显著高于为65岁以上患者推荐的剂量。未根据年龄调整剂量可能导致低血压发作。