Mathur Vani A, Kiley Kasey B, Carroll C Patrick, Edwards Robert R, Lanzkron Sophie, Haythornthwaite Jennifer A, Campbell Claudia M
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Pain. 2016 Nov;17(11):1227-1236. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
Catastrophizing is a potent psychological modulator of pain across several chronic pain populations; yet despite evidence that patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) catastrophize more than patients with other chronic pain conditions, previous research indicates that catastrophizing is not related to sickle cell pain after controlling for relevant covariates such as depression. Recent research suggests that pain-related catastrophizing should be assessed across pain contexts (eg, dispositional and situational). In this study, we measured disease-specific, general non-disease-related, and situational catastrophizing and assessed the relationship between these contextual dimensions of catastrophizing and laboratory and clinical pain among patients with SCD. Results revealed differential catastrophizing across pain contexts, with patients reporting greater catastrophizing about SCD-specific pain compared with non-SCD pain and laboratory pain. SCD-specific and non-SCD catastrophizing were associated with clinical pain outcomes, and situational catastrophizing with markers of central sensitization and laboratory pain. Further examination of the time course of laboratory responses revealed that increases in situational catastrophizing were associated with subsequent increases in laboratory pain sensitivity. Taken together, results show the relevance of catastrophizing in understanding pain in SCD, and suggest that context-specific anchors may be beneficial in predicting different aspects of the pain experience (eg, chronic pain, pain sensitization).
Patients with SCD report greater catastrophizing about sickle cell-specific pain relative to other pains. Disease-specific and non-disease-related pain catastrophizing were associated with clinical pain, and situational catastrophizing predictive of subsequent laboratory pain. Evaluation of context-specific catastrophizing may more accurately predict different aspects of the pain experience.
灾难化思维是多种慢性疼痛人群中疼痛的一种强大心理调节因素;然而,尽管有证据表明镰状细胞病(SCD)患者比其他慢性疼痛患者更容易出现灾难化思维,但先前的研究表明,在控制了诸如抑郁等相关协变量后,灾难化思维与镰状细胞疼痛并无关联。最近的研究表明,应在不同疼痛情境(如特质性和情境性)下评估与疼痛相关的灾难化思维。在本研究中,我们测量了疾病特异性、一般非疾病相关以及情境性灾难化思维,并评估了这些灾难化思维的情境维度与SCD患者实验室疼痛和临床疼痛之间的关系。结果显示,不同疼痛情境下的灾难化思维存在差异,患者报告称,与非SCD疼痛和实验室疼痛相比,对SCD特异性疼痛的灾难化思维更强烈。SCD特异性和非SCD灾难化思维与临床疼痛结果相关,情境性灾难化思维与中枢敏化标志物和实验室疼痛相关。对实验室反应时间进程的进一步检查发现,情境性灾难化思维的增加与随后实验室疼痛敏感性的增加相关。综合来看,结果表明灾难化思维在理解SCD疼痛方面具有相关性,并表明针对特定情境的锚定因素可能有助于预测疼痛体验的不同方面(如慢性疼痛、疼痛敏化)。
与其他疼痛相比,SCD患者对镰状细胞特异性疼痛的灾难化思维更强烈。疾病特异性和非疾病相关的疼痛灾难化思维与临床疼痛相关,情境性灾难化思维可预测随后的实验室疼痛。评估针对特定情境的灾难化思维可能更准确地预测疼痛体验的不同方面。