Suppr超能文献

照片筛选仪在弱视早期检测中的优势、局限性及诊断准确性:综述

Advantages, limitations, and diagnostic accuracy of photoscreeners in early detection of amblyopia: a review.

作者信息

Sanchez Irene, Ortiz-Toquero Sara, Martin Raul, de Juan Victoria

机构信息

Department of Theoretical Physics, Atomic and Optics, School of Optometry; Optometry Research Group, IOBA-Eye Institute, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.

Optometry Research Group, IOBA-Eye Institute, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain; Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul 22;10:1365-73. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S93714. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Amblyopia detection is important to ensure proper visual development and avoid permanent decrease of visual acuity. This condition does not produce symptoms, so it is difficult to diagnose if a vision problem actually exists. However, because amblyopia treatment is limited by age, early diagnosis is of paramount relevance. Traditional vision screening (conducted in <3 years) is related with difficulty in getting cooperation from a subject to conduct the eye exam, so accurate objective methods to improve amblyopia detection are necessary. Handheld devices used for photoscreening or autorefraction could offer advantages to improve amblyopia screening because they reduce exploration time to just few seconds, no subject collaboration is needed, and they provide objective information. The purpose of this review is to summarize the main functions and clinical applicability of commercially available devices for early detection of amblyopia and to describe their differences, advantages, and limitations. Although the studies reviewed are heterogeneous (due to wide differences in referral criteria, use of different risk factors, different types of samples studied, etc), these devices provide objective measures in a quick and objective way with a simple outcome report: retest, pass, or refer. However, due to major limitations, these devices are not recommended, and their use in clinical practice is limited.

摘要

弱视检测对于确保正常的视觉发育和避免视力永久性下降至关重要。这种情况不会产生症状,因此如果确实存在视力问题则很难诊断。然而,由于弱视治疗受年龄限制,早期诊断至关重要。传统的视力筛查(在3岁以下儿童中进行)存在难以让受检者配合进行眼部检查的问题,因此需要准确的客观方法来改善弱视检测。用于照片筛查或自动验光的手持设备可能有助于改善弱视筛查,因为它们将检查时间缩短至仅几秒,无需受检者配合,并且能提供客观信息。本综述的目的是总结市售设备用于早期检测弱视的主要功能和临床适用性,并描述它们的差异、优点和局限性。尽管所综述的研究具有异质性(由于转诊标准、使用的不同风险因素、所研究样本的不同类型等存在很大差异),但这些设备能以快速且客观的方式提供客观测量结果,并带有简单的结果报告:复测、通过或转诊。然而,由于存在重大局限性,不推荐使用这些设备,它们在临床实践中的应用也很有限。

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting myopic changes in children wearing glasses using the Plusoptix photoscreener.
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 16;44(1):84. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-02954-9.
2
Home-based screening tools for amblyopia: a systematic review.
Eye (Lond). 2023 Sep;37(13):2649-2658. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02412-3. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
3
The UCI EyeMobile Preschool Vision Screening Program: Refractive Error and Amblyopia Results from the 2019-2020 School Year.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec 20;16:4249-4255. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S382899. eCollection 2022.
4
Photorefraction Screening Plus Atropine Treatment for Myopia is Cost-Effective: A Proof-of-Concept Markov Analysis.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 13;16:1941-1952. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S362342. eCollection 2022.
5
Vision screening using a smartphone platform.
Rev Paul Pediatr. 2022 May 6;40:e2020021. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/2022/40/2020021IN. eCollection 2022.
6
Accuracy of Photorefraction and Wavefront-Based Autorefraction in Children Under 3 Years of Age.
Beyoglu Eye J. 2021 Feb 13;6(1):54-61. doi: 10.14744/bej.2021.09825. eCollection 2021.
7
A novel device for assessment of amblyopic risk factors in preverbal and verbal children-a pilot study.
Eye (Lond). 2022 Dec;36(12):2312-2317. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01860-z. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
8
Technologies supporting vision screening: a protocol for a scoping review.
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 2;11(9):e050819. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050819.
9
Effectiveness of Kanna photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug;69(8):2045-2049. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2912_20.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing interventions to increase compliance to patching treatment in children with amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb;100(2):159-65. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307340. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
2
Evaluation of the Spot Vision Screener in young children in Costa Rica.
J AAPOS. 2015 Oct;19(5):441-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.08.002.
3
Accuracy of the Spot and Plusoptix photoscreeners for detection of astigmatism.
J AAPOS. 2015 Oct;19(5):435-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.07.284.
4
Performance of the Plusoptix A09 photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in Chinese children attending an eye clinic.
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 1;10(6):e0126052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126052. eCollection 2015.
5
Reliability and reproducibility of a handheld videorefractor.
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 May;92(5):632-41. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000566.
6
Comparison of the Plusoptix A09 and Retinomax K-Plus 3 with retinoscopy in children.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015 Jan-Feb;52(1):37-42. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20141230-06.
7
The effectiveness of the Spot Vision Screener in detecting amblyopia risk factors.
J AAPOS. 2014 Dec;18(6):539-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.07.176.
8
Validation of Spot screening device for amblyopia risk factors.
J AAPOS. 2014 Oct;18(5):476-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.07.156. Epub 2014 Sep 27.
9
Photoscreeners in the pediatric eye office: compared testability and refractions on high-risk children.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Nov;158(5):932-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.07.041. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
10
Calibration and validation of the 2WIN photoscreener compared to the PlusoptiX S12 and the SPOT.
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2014 Sep-Oct;51(5):289-92. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20140701-01. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验