Department of Surgery, Harbor-University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance.
David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles.
JAMA Surg. 2016 Nov 1;151(11):1039-1045. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2329.
Acute cholangitis (AC), particularly severe AC, has historically required urgent endoscopic decompression, although the timing of decompression is controversial. We previously identified 2 admission risk factors for adverse outcomes in AC: total bilirubin level greater than 10 mg/dL and white blood cell count greater than 20 000 cells/µL.
To validate previously identified prognostic factors in AC, evaluate the effect of timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography on clinical outcomes, and compare recent experience with AC vs an historical cohort.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis (2008-2015) of patients with AC (validation cohort, n = 196) was conducted at 2 academic medical centers to validate predictors of adverse outcome. Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and outcome were stratified by severity using the Tokyo Guidelines for acute cholangitis diagnosis. Outcomes for the validation cohort were compared with the derivation cohort (1995-2005; n = 114). Data analysis was conducted from July 1, 2015, to September 9, 2015.
Death and a composite outcome of death or organ failure.
The median age of patients in the derivation cohort was 54 years (interquartile range, 40-65 years) and in the validation cohort was 59 years (45-67 years). Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the validation cohort confirmed white blood cell count of more than 20 000 cells/µL (odds ratio, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2-9.5; P = .02) and total bilirubin level of more than 10 mg/dL (odds ratio, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.8-16.4; P = .003) as independent risk factors for poor outcomes. In the validation cohort, timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was not significantly different between those with and without an adverse outcome, even when stratified by AC severity (moderate: median, 0.6 hours [interquartile range (IQR), 0.5-0.9] vs 1.7 hours [IQR, 0.7-18.0] and severe: median, 10.6 hours [IQR, 1.2-35.1] vs 25.5 hours [IQR, 15.5-58.5] for those with and without adverse events, respectively). Patients in the validation cohort had a shorter hospital length of stay (median, 7 days [IQR, 4-10 days] vs 9 days [IQR, 5-16 days]) and lower rate of intensive care unit admission (26% vs 82%), despite a higher rate of severe cholangitis (n = 131 [67%] vs n = 29 [25%]). There were no significant differences in the composite outcome between the validation and derivation cohorts (22 [18.6%] vs 44 [22.4%]; P = .47). Adjusted analysis demonstrated decreased mortality in the validation cohort (odds ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.7; P = .01).
White blood cell count greater than 20 000 cells/µL and total bilirubin level greater than 10 mg/dL are independent prognostic factors for adverse outcomes in AC. Consideration should be given to include these criteria in the Tokyo Guidelines severity assessment. Timing of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography does not appear to affect clinical outcomes in these patients. Management of AC has improved with time, with an overall shorter hospital length of stay, lower rate of intensive care unit admission, and a decreased adjusted mortality, demonstrating improvements in care efficiency and delivery.
急性胆管炎(AC),尤其是严重 AC,过去需要紧急内镜减压,但减压的时机仍存在争议。我们之前确定了 AC 不良结局的 2 个入院风险因素:总胆红素水平大于 10mg/dL 和白细胞计数大于 20000 细胞/µL。
验证 AC 中先前确定的预后因素,评估内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的时机对临床结局的影响,并比较 AC 的近期经验与历史队列。
设计、地点和参与者:对 2 个学术医疗中心的 AC 患者(验证队列,n=196)进行回顾性分析(2008-2015 年),以验证不良结局的预测因素。根据东京急性胆管炎诊断指南,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的时机和结局按严重程度分层。验证队列的结局与推导队列(1995-2005 年;n=114)进行比较。数据分析于 2015 年 7 月 1 日至 2015 年 9 月 9 日进行。
死亡和死亡或器官衰竭的复合结局。
推导队列的中位年龄为 54 岁(四分位距,40-65 岁),验证队列的中位年龄为 59 岁(四分位距,45-67 岁)。验证队列的多变量逻辑回归分析证实白细胞计数大于 20000 细胞/µL(比值比,3.4;95%置信区间,1.2-9.5;P=0.02)和总胆红素水平大于 10mg/dL(比值比,5.4;95%置信区间,1.8-16.4;P=0.003)是不良结局的独立危险因素。在验证队列中,即使按 AC 严重程度分层,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的时机在有不良结局和无不良结局的患者之间没有显著差异,中度:中位数为 0.6 小时(四分位距,0.5-0.9)与 1.7 小时(四分位距,0.7-18.0),重度:中位数为 10.6 小时(四分位距,1.2-35.1)与 25.5 小时(四分位距,15.5-58.5)。验证队列的患者住院时间更短(中位数,7 天[四分位距,4-10 天]与 9 天[四分位距,5-16 天]),入住重症监护病房的比例更低(26%与 82%),尽管严重胆管炎的发生率更高(n=131[67%]与 n=29[25%])。验证队列和推导队列之间的复合结局无显著差异(22[18.6%]与 44[22.4%];P=0.47)。调整分析显示验证队列的死亡率降低(比值比,0.3;95%置信区间,0.1-0.7;P=0.01)。
白细胞计数大于 20000 细胞/µL 和总胆红素水平大于 10mg/dL 是 AC 不良结局的独立预后因素。考虑在东京指南严重程度评估中纳入这些标准。内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的时机似乎不会影响这些患者的临床结局。随着时间的推移,AC 的管理有所改善,总住院时间更短,入住重症监护病房的比例更低,调整后的死亡率降低,这表明护理效率和交付得到了提高。