• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜逆行胰胆管造影延迟和不成功与急性胆管炎患者的预后较差有关。

Delayed and unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are associated with worse outcomes in patients with acute cholangitis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Oct;10(10):1157-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.03.029. Epub 2012 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.03.029
PMID:22507875
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acute ascending cholangitis usually is treated with antibiotics, and biliary drainage is treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We investigated the effects of the timing of ERCP on outcomes of patients with acute cholangitis factors that predict prolonged hospital stays, increased costs of hospitalization, and composite clinical outcomes (death, persistent organ failure, and admission to the intensive care unit).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 90 patients (mean age, 60 y; 48% female) admitted to Johns Hopkins Hospital from January 1994 to June 2010 who were diagnosed with acute cholangitis and underwent ERCP. A delayed ERCP was defined as one performed more than 72 hours after admission. Electronic and paper medical records were reviewed, and relevant data were abstracted.

RESULTS

ERCP was performed successfully in 92% of the patients, at a mean time period of 38 hours after admission (14% of ERCPs were delayed). Factors that were associated independently with prolonged length of hospital stay (top 10%) included unsuccessful ERCP (odds ratio [OR], 52.5; P = .002) and delayed ERCP (OR, 19.8; P = .008). Factors associated with increased hospitalization cost (top 10%) included unsuccessful ERCP (OR, 33.8; P = .004) and delayed ERCP (OR, 11.3; P = .03). Factors associated with composite clinical outcome included age (OR, 1.1; P = .01), total level of bilirubin (OR, 1.36; P = .002), and delayed ERCP (OR, 7.8; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed and failed ERCP are associated with prolonged hospital stays and increased costs of hospitalization. Delayed ERCP is associated with composite clinical outcome (death, persistent organ failure, and/or intensive care unit stay). Older age and higher levels of bilirubin also are associated with patients' composite end point.

摘要

背景与目的

急性上行性胆管炎通常采用抗生素治疗,胆道引流采用内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)治疗。我们研究了 ERCP 时机对急性胆管炎患者结局的影响,以及预测住院时间延长、住院费用增加和复合临床结局(死亡、持续器官衰竭和入住重症监护病房)的因素。

方法

我们对 1994 年 1 月至 2010 年 6 月期间在约翰霍普金斯医院就诊并接受 ERCP 治疗的 90 名急性胆管炎患者进行了回顾性数据分析。延迟 ERCP 定义为入院后超过 72 小时进行的 ERCP。电子病历和纸质病历均进行了审查,并提取了相关数据。

结果

92%的患者成功进行了 ERCP,平均在入院后 38 小时进行(14%的 ERCP 延迟)。与住院时间延长(前 10%)独立相关的因素包括 ERCP 失败(比值比 [OR],52.5;P=.002)和延迟 ERCP(OR,19.8;P=.008)。与住院费用增加(前 10%)独立相关的因素包括 ERCP 失败(OR,33.8;P=.004)和延迟 ERCP(OR,11.3;P=.03)。与复合临床结局独立相关的因素包括年龄(OR,1.1;P=.01)、总胆红素水平(OR,1.36;P=.002)和延迟 ERCP(OR,7.8;P=.04)。

结论

延迟和失败的 ERCP 与住院时间延长和住院费用增加有关。延迟 ERCP 与复合临床结局(死亡、持续器官衰竭和/或入住重症监护病房)有关。年龄较大和胆红素水平较高也与患者的复合终点有关。

相似文献

1
Delayed and unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are associated with worse outcomes in patients with acute cholangitis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影延迟和不成功与急性胆管炎患者的预后较差有关。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Oct;10(10):1157-61. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.03.029. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
2
Decreasing mortality from acute biliary diseases that require endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a nationwide cohort study.降低需要内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗的急性胆系疾病死亡率:一项全国性队列研究。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Jul;12(7):1151-1159.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.054. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
3
Delay in performing ERCP and adverse events increase the 30-day readmission risk in patients with acute cholangitis.急性胆管炎患者行 ERCP 延迟和不良事件增加 30 天再入院风险。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Jul;78(1):81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
4
Weekend vs. Weekday Admissions for Cholangitis Requiring an ERCP: Comparison of Outcomes in a National Cohort.周末与工作日因胆系感染而行 ERCP 治疗的患者:一项全国性队列研究的结局比较。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;111(3):405-10. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.425. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
5
Optimal Timing of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Acute Cholangitis.急性胆管炎内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的最佳时机
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul;51(6):534-538. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000763.
6
Association of Admission Laboratory Values and the Timing of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography With Clinical Outcomes in Acute Cholangitis.入院时实验室检查值与内镜逆行胰胆管造影时机与急性胆管炎临床结局的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Nov 1;151(11):1039-1045. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2329.
7
Clinical presentation and delayed treatment of cholangitis in older people.老年人胆管炎的临床表现及延迟治疗
Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Dec;50(12):2207-10. doi: 10.1007/s10620-005-3035-5.
8
Decreasing hospitalization and in-hospital mortality related to cholangitis in the United States.美国胆系感染相关住院率和院内病死率降低。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov-Dec;45(10):e92-6. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31822f364c.
9
No Association of Timing of Endoscopic Biliary Drainage with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Non-severe Acute Cholangitis.内镜下胆道引流时机与非重症急性胆管炎患者临床结局无关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jul;63(7):1937-1945. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5058-8. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
10
The roles of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (MRCP and ERCP) in the diagnosis of patients with suspected sclerosing cholangitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.磁共振成像和内镜逆行胰胆管造影(MRCP和ERCP)在疑似硬化性胆管炎患者诊断中的作用:一项成本效益分析。
Endoscopy. 2007 Mar;39(3):222-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966253.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of atrial fibrillation in hospitalized patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A nationwide analysis.心房颤动对接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的住院患者的影响:一项全国性分析。
World J Methodol. 2025 Dec 20;15(4):105053. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.105053.
2
Emergency one-stage endoscopic treatment in the older adults with acute cholangitis with choledocholithiasis: a propensity score-matched analysis.老年急性胆管炎合并胆总管结石患者的急诊一期内镜治疗:倾向评分匹配分析
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01296-8.
3
Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients with Acute Cholangitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.
COVID-19 合并急性胆囊炎患者的转归:一项单中心回顾性分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Aug 20;60(8):1354. doi: 10.3390/medicina60081354.
4
Digital cholangioscope assisted radiation-free bedside one-stage endoscopic lithotomy and biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis caused by choledocholithiasis.数字胆道镜辅助无辐射床边一期内镜碎石取石和胆道引流治疗胆总管结石引起的重度急性胆管炎。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 13;14(1):18830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69943-x.
5
Urgent one-stage endoscopic treatment for choledocholithiasis related moderate to severe acute cholangitis: A propensity score-matched analysis.胆总管结石相关中重度急性胆管炎的紧急内镜一期治疗:倾向评分匹配分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 21;30(15):2118-2127. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i15.2118.
6
Elevated plasma and bile levels of corisin, a microbiota-derived proapoptotic peptide, in patients with severe acute cholangitis.严重急性胆管炎患者血浆和胆汁中微生物群衍生的促凋亡肽corisin水平升高。
Gut Pathog. 2023 Nov 30;15(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13099-023-00587-4.
7
Acute cholangitis: Does malignant biliary obstruction choledocholithiasis etiology change the clinical presentation and outcomes?急性胆管炎:恶性胆管梗阻性胆总管结石病因是否会改变临床表现及预后?
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Oct 16;11(29):6984-6994. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i29.6984.
8
Evaluation of Clinical Indications of Three Treatments for Choledocholithiasis with Acute Cholangitis.三种治疗胆总管结石合并急性胆管炎方法的临床指征评估
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Oct 16;16:4669-4680. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S429781. eCollection 2023.
9
A Nomogram-Based Model for Predicting the Risk of Severe Acute Cholangitis Occurrence.一种基于列线图的预测严重急性胆管炎发生风险的模型。
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Jul 25;16:3139-3150. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S416108. eCollection 2023.
10
Early Biliary Decompression Reduces Morbidity but Not Mortality in Acute Ascending Cholangitis.早期胆道减压可降低急性化脓性胆管炎的发病率,但不能降低死亡率。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 10;15(3):e35989. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35989. eCollection 2023 Mar.