Dodd Roger Y, Notari Edward P, Nelson Diane, Foster Gregory A, Krysztof David E, Kaidarova Zhanna, Milan-Benson Lisa, Kessler Debra A, Shaz Beth H, Vahidnia Farnaz, Custer Brian, Stramer Susan L
Scientific Affairs, Holland Laboratory, American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland.
Scientific Affairs, American Red Cross, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Transfusion. 2016 Nov;56(11):2781-2789. doi: 10.1111/trf.13759. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
The frequency of positive test results for transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) among blood donors is an important index of safety; thus, appropriate monitoring is critical, particularly when there are changes in policies affecting donor suitability.
Testing algorithms from three large blood systems were reviewed and consensus definitions for a surveillance-positive result for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) established. In addition, information on each donation, including donor demographics and location, was collected. Combined data were analyzed to characterize the epidemiology of TTIs by person, place, and time.
Data from 14.8 million donations were collected for 2011 to 2012, representing more than 50% of the US blood supply. Surveillance-positive rates per 10,000 donations were as follows: HBV, 0.76; HCV, 2.0; HIV, 0.28; and HTLV 0.34. Rates did not vary between the 2 years, although there was variation within a year. With the exception of HTLV, rates were higher among males, and all rates were higher among first-time donations. Window-period donations (those positive only in nucleic acid tests) were infrequent (HBV, 13; HCV, 60; HIV, 14) during the 2-year period. Frequencies of surveillance-positive results varied by donor age and residence location.
We demonstrated that standardized data from multiple major US blood systems can be combined and analyzed for change. However, TTI frequencies are low, impacting their sensitivity to change. Furthermore, observed fluctuations in TTI frequencies may be secondary to changes in blood donor demographics rather than necessarily reflecting the immediate impact of policy modification.
献血者中输血传播感染(TTIs)检测结果呈阳性的频率是安全性的一项重要指标;因此,进行适当监测至关重要,尤其是在影响献血者适宜性的政策发生变化时。
对来自三个大型血液系统的检测算法进行了审查,并确立了乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)、丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)、人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)和人类嗜T淋巴细胞病毒(HTLV)监测阳性结果的共识定义。此外,收集了每次献血的信息,包括献血者的人口统计学数据和地点。对合并数据进行分析,以按人、地点和时间描述TTIs的流行病学特征。
收集了2011年至2012年1480万次献血的数据,占美国血液供应量的50%以上。每10000次献血的监测阳性率如下:HBV为0.76;HCV为2.0;HIV为0.28;HTLV为0.34。虽然一年内存在变化,但这两年的比率没有差异。除HTLV外,男性中的比率更高,并且所有比率在首次献血者中更高。在这两年期间,窗口期献血(仅核酸检测呈阳性的献血)很少见(HBV为13例;HCV为60例;HIV为14例)。监测阳性结果的频率因献血者年龄和居住地点而异。
我们证明,来自美国多个主要血液系统的标准化数据可以合并并分析其变化情况。然而,TTIs的频率较低,影响了其对变化的敏感性。此外,观察到的TTIs频率波动可能是献血者人口统计学变化的结果,而不一定反映政策调整的直接影响。