Harasawa H, Yamazaki C, Itoh A, Masuko K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1989 Feb 25;49(2):191-8.
We evaluated the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) and the roentgenologic heart size (RHS) as the indices of body fluid retention in 31 of uremic patients under hemodialysis. The maximum changes of the roentgenologic thoracic diameter, measured monthly for one year in 31 patients, varied from 10 to 68 mm. The average differences of RHS and CTR between maximum inspiration and forced inspiration in 18 healthy people were 1 mm (RHS) and 2.5% (CTR), respectively, and the change of roentgenologic thoracic diameter was 12 mm. The error of repeated CTR measurements in a period of one year could be estimated more than 2%. In 22 patients the body weight reduction of 1 kg corresponded to a 4 mm decrease of RHS (p less than 0.005) and 1.5% of CTR (p less than 0.05), respectively. In relation to the change of body fluid balance assessed by the change of body weight, RHS showed a higher correlation than CTR. These results could be attributed that RHS was hardly influenced by the respiration, whereas CTR was surprisingly affected. It is concluded that the measurement of RHS is more useful as an index of control of body fluid balance than CTR.
我们评估了心胸比率(CTR)和X线心脏大小(RHS)作为31例接受血液透析的尿毒症患者体液潴留指标的情况。对31例患者进行为期一年的每月一次的测量,X线胸廓直径的最大变化范围为10至68毫米。18名健康人在最大吸气和用力吸气之间RHS和CTR的平均差异分别为1毫米(RHS)和2.5%(CTR),X线胸廓直径的变化为12毫米。一年内重复测量CTR的误差估计超过2%。在22例患者中,体重减轻1千克分别对应RHS降低4毫米(p<0.005)和CTR降低1.5%(p<0.05)。就通过体重变化评估的体液平衡变化而言,RHS的相关性高于CTR。这些结果可能归因于RHS几乎不受呼吸影响,而CTR却受到惊人的影响。结论是,作为体液平衡控制指标,测量RHS比CTR更有用。