Ahn Jun Hyong, Jun Hyo Sub, Song Joon Ho, Cho Byung Moon, Lee Ho Kook, Kim Byong-Cheol, Hyun Dong-Keun, Chang In Bok
Department of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwasung, Korea.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Mar;9(3):244-249. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012457. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
To examine the safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy using a retrievable stent for thromboembolic occlusion occurring during coil embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Between June 2011 and June 2015, 631 consecutive patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms underwent coil embolization at 6 hospitals. Among 53 patients who had thromboembolic complications, 15 patients harboring 15 aneurysms underwent rescue mechanical thrombectomy with a retrievable stent for the treatment of thromboembolic occlusion during the coiling of ruptured aneurysms. The patients' clinical and radiologic outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.
Of the 15 aneurysms, coiling alone was used for 13 (86.7%), and stent-assisted coiling was performed for 2 (13.3%). Thromboembolic occlusion most frequently occurred distal to the aneurysm (n=10, 66.7%), followed by proximal to the aneurysm (n=3, 20%), and at the coil-parent vessel interface (n=2, 13.3%). All patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy with a retrievable stent, including 5 patients who were initially treated with an IA tirofiban infusion. Complete recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 3) was obtained in 13 (86.7%) and partial recanalization (TICI 2b) in 2 (13.3%). Two patients who had received IA tirofiban before mechanical thrombectomy had hemorrhagic complications. At 6 months after discharge, 9 patients had a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 1, 3 patients were mRS 2, 1 patient was mRS 3, 1 patient was mRS 4, and 1 patient was mRS 6.
Rescue mechanical thrombectomy using a retrievable stent can be a useful treatment for thromboembolic occlusion occurring during coil embolization of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.
探讨使用可回收支架进行机械取栓治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤弹簧圈栓塞过程中发生的血栓栓塞性闭塞的安全性和有效性。
2011年6月至2015年6月,6家医院的631例连续破裂颅内动脉瘤患者接受了弹簧圈栓塞治疗。在53例发生血栓栓塞并发症的患者中,15例患者(共15个动脉瘤)在破裂动脉瘤弹簧圈栓塞过程中因血栓栓塞性闭塞接受了使用可回收支架的挽救性机械取栓治疗。对患者的临床和影像学结果进行回顾性分析。
15个动脉瘤中,单纯弹簧圈栓塞13个(86.7%),支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞2个(13.3%)。血栓栓塞性闭塞最常发生在动脉瘤远端(n = 10,66.7%),其次是动脉瘤近端(n = 3,20%),以及弹簧圈-载瘤血管界面(n = 2,13.3%)。所有患者均接受了使用可回收支架的机械取栓治疗,其中5例患者最初接受了动脉内替罗非班输注治疗。13例(86.7%)实现了完全再通(脑梗死溶栓分级(TICI)3级),2例(13.3%)实现了部分再通(TICI 2b级)。2例在机械取栓前接受动脉内替罗非班治疗的患者出现了出血并发症。出院后6个月时,9例患者改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分为1分,3例为mRS 2分,1例为mRS 3分,1例为mRS 4分,1例为mRS 6分。
使用可回收支架进行挽救性机械取栓可有效治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤弹簧圈栓塞过程中发生的血栓栓塞性闭塞。