Suppr超能文献

医师助理与全科医生会诊:一项比较性观察视频研究。

Physician Associate and General Practitioner Consultations: A Comparative Observational Video Study.

作者信息

de Lusignan Simon, McGovern Andrew P, Tahir Mohammad Aumran, Hassan Simon, Jones Simon, Halter Mary, Joly Louise, Drennan Vari M

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.

Division of Population Health Sciences and Education St. George's University of London, London, SW17 0RE, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Aug 25;11(8):e0160902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160902. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physician associates, known internationally as physician assistants, are a mid-level practitioner, well established in the United States of America but new to the United Kingdom. A small number work in primary care under the supervision of general practitioners, where they most commonly see patients requesting same day appointments for new problems. As an adjunct to larger study, we investigated the quality of the patient consultation of physician associates in comparison to that of general practitioners.

METHOD

We conducted a comparative observational study using video recordings of consultations by volunteer physician associates and general practitioners with consenting patients in single surgery sessions. Recordings were assessed by experienced general practitioners, blinded to the type of the consulting practitioner, using the Leicester Assessment Package. Assessors were asked to comment on the safety of the recorded consultations and to attempt to identify the type of practitioner. Ratings were compared across practitioner type, alongside the number of presenting complaints discussed in each consultation and the number of these which were acute, minor, or regarding a chronic condition.

RESULTS

We assessed 62 consultations (41 general practitioner and 21 physician associates) from five general practitioners and four physician associates. All consultations were assessed as safe; but general practitioners were rated higher than PAs in all elements of consultation. The general practitioners were more likely than physician associates to see people with multiple presenting complaints (p<0.0001) and with chronic disease related complaints (p = 0.008). Assessors correctly identified general practitioner consultations but not physician associates. The Leicester Assessment Package had limited inter-rater and intra-rater reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

The physician associate consultations were with a less complex patient group. They were judged as competent and safe, although general practitioner consultations, unsurprisingly, were rated as more competent. Physician associates offer a complementary addition to the medical workforce in general practice.

摘要

背景

医师助理在国际上被称为执业医师助理,是中级医疗从业者,在美国已成熟,但在英国尚属新生事物。少数医师助理在全科医生的监督下从事初级医疗工作,他们最常接待的是那些因新问题而要求当日就诊的患者。作为一项更大规模研究的补充,我们比较了医师助理与全科医生的患者诊疗质量。

方法

我们进行了一项比较观察性研究,使用志愿者医师助理和全科医生与同意参与的患者在单次诊疗时段进行诊疗的视频记录。记录由经验丰富的全科医生进行评估,评估者对诊疗医生的类型不知情,使用莱斯特评估包。评估者被要求对记录的诊疗安全性发表评论,并尝试识别诊疗医生的类型。对不同类型医生的评分进行比较,同时比较每次诊疗中讨论的主诉数量以及其中急性、轻微或慢性病相关主诉的数量。

结果

我们评估了来自5名全科医生和4名医师助理的62次诊疗(41次全科医生诊疗和21次医师助理诊疗)。所有诊疗均被评估为安全;但在诊疗的各个方面,全科医生的评分均高于医师助理。与医师助理相比,全科医生更有可能接待有多种主诉的患者(p<0.0001)以及有慢性病相关主诉的患者(p = 0.008)。评估者能够正确识别全科医生的诊疗,但无法识别医师助理的诊疗。莱斯特评估包的评分者间和评分者内信度有限。

结论

医师助理的诊疗对象是病情不太复杂的患者群体。他们被认为具备能力且诊疗安全,尽管不出所料,全科医生的诊疗被评为更具能力。医师助理为全科医疗的医疗队伍提供了补充。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7de8/4999215/27e18790c4fa/pone.0160902.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验