• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

各个尺度的结构:关于不相关概念之间相似性的语义网络解释。

Structure at every scale: A semantic network account of the similarities between unrelated concepts.

作者信息

De Deyne Simon, Navarro Daniel J, Perfors Amy, Storms Gert

机构信息

Computational Cognitive Science Lab, School of Psychology, University of Adelaide.

University of New South Wales.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Sep;145(9):1228-54. doi: 10.1037/xge0000192.

DOI:10.1037/xge0000192
PMID:27560855
Abstract

Similarity plays an important role in organizing the semantic system. However, given that similarity cannot be defined on purely logical grounds, it is important to understand how people perceive similarities between different entities. Despite this, the vast majority of studies focus on measuring similarity between very closely related items. When considering concepts that are very weakly related, little is known. In this article, we present 4 experiments showing that there are reliable and systematic patterns in how people evaluate the similarities between very dissimilar entities. We present a semantic network account of these similarities showing that a spreading activation mechanism defined over a word association network naturally makes correct predictions about weak similarities, whereas, though simpler, models based on direct neighbors between word pairs derived using the same network cannot. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

相似性在组织语义系统中起着重要作用。然而,鉴于相似性不能仅仅基于逻辑来定义,了解人们如何感知不同实体之间的相似性就很重要。尽管如此,绝大多数研究都集中在测量密切相关项目之间的相似性。当考虑非常弱相关的概念时,我们知之甚少。在本文中,我们展示了4个实验,表明人们在评估非常不相似实体之间的相似性时存在可靠且系统的模式。我们提出了一个关于这些相似性的语义网络解释,表明在词联想网络上定义的扩散激活机制自然地对弱相似性做出了正确预测,而基于使用同一网络导出的词对之间直接邻域的模型虽然更简单,但却不能。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
Structure at every scale: A semantic network account of the similarities between unrelated concepts.各个尺度的结构:关于不相关概念之间相似性的语义网络解释。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Sep;145(9):1228-54. doi: 10.1037/xge0000192.
2
Format change and semantic relatedness effects on the ERP correlates of recognition: old pairs, new pairs, different stories.格式变化和语义相关性对识别的事件相关电位相关性的影响:旧对、新对、不同故事。
Exp Brain Res. 2017 Apr;235(4):1007-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4859-2. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
3
Semantic similarity: normative ratings for 185 Spanish noun triplets.语义相似度:185个西班牙语名词三元组的规范评级
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Sep;47(3):788-99. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0501-z.
4
Right fusiform response patterns reflect visual object identity rather than semantic similarity.右侧梭状回的反应模式反映的是视觉物体识别而非语义相似性。
Neuroimage. 2013 Dec;83:87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.128. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
5
Contrasting graded effects of semantic similarity and association across the concreteness spectrum.对比语义相似性和关联性在具体性范围内的分级效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Jul;64(7):1388-408. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2010.543285.
6
The multidetermined nature of idiom processing.习语处理的多因素决定性质。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1103-21. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.6.1103.
7
Semantic variability predicts neural variability of object concepts.语义变异性可预测物体概念的神经变异性。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Sep;76:41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.029. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
8
Semantic similarity between old and new items produces false alarms in recognition memory.新旧项目之间的语义相似性会在识别记忆中产生错误警报。
Psychol Res. 2015 Sep;79(5):785-94. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0615-z. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
9
Is semantic priming (ir)rational? Insights from the speeded word fragment completion task.语义启动效应是(不)合理的吗?来自快速单词片段完成任务的见解。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Oct;42(10):1657-1663. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000260. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
10
Latent semantic analysis cosines as a cognitive similarity measure: Evidence from priming studies.潜在语义分析余弦作为一种认知相似性度量:来自启动研究的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(4):626-53. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1038280. Epub 2015 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Valence as principal dimension of the semantic space in primary progressive aphasia semantic variant.效价作为原发性进行性失语语义变异型语义空间的主要维度。
Brain Commun. 2025 Jul 23;7(4):fcaf281. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf281. eCollection 2025.
2
Measuring individual semantic networks: A simulation study.测量个体语义网络:一项模拟研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 11;20(8):e0328712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328712. eCollection 2025.
3
A large-scale database of Mandarin Chinese word associations from the Small World of Words Project.
一个来自“词汇小世界”项目的大规模汉语词语联想数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 30;57(1):34. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02513-1.
4
Novel embeddings improve the prediction of risk perception.新型嵌入改进了风险感知的预测。
EPJ Data Sci. 2024;13(1):38. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00478-x. Epub 2024 May 22.
5
Spontaneous eye movements reflect the representational geometries of conceptual spaces.自发性眼球运动反映了概念空间的表示几何形状。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Apr 23;121(17):e2403858121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2403858121. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
6
Using Monte-Carlo simulation to test predictions about the time-course of semantic and lexical access in reading.使用蒙特卡罗模拟来测试阅读中语义和词汇通达时间进程的预测。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 2;19(4):e0296874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296874. eCollection 2024.
7
Semantic representations in inferior frontal and lateral temporal cortex during picture naming, reading, and repetition.下额前皮质和外侧颞叶皮质在图片命名、阅读和重复任务中的语义表现。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Feb 1;45(2):e26603. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26603.
8
Unraveling lexical semantics in the brain: Comparing internal, external, and hybrid language models.揭示大脑中的词汇语义:比较内部、外部和混合语言模型。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Jan;45(1):e26546. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26546. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
9
What Drives Animal Fluency Performance in Cantonese-Speaking Chinese Patients with Adult-Onset Psychosis?是什么驱动了成年期起病的粤语精神病患者的动物流畅性表现?
Brain Sci. 2023 Feb 21;13(3):372. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13030372.
10
Cross-domain semantic alignment: concrete concepts are more abstract than you think.跨领域语义对齐:具体概念比你想象的更抽象。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 13;378(1870):20210372. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0372. Epub 2022 Dec 26.