Caus Thierry, Sirota Dmitry, Nader Joseph, Lyashenko Maxim, Chernyavsky Alexander
University Hospital Amiens, Amiens, France ;
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jul;5(4):336-45. doi: 10.21037/acs.2016.05.07.
The effectiveness of additional stenting of the distal aorta as compared to conventional surgery alone in type A aortic dissection (TAD) has yet to be proven.
We conducted this multicenter comparative study to evaluate the effects of antegrade bare stenting of the dissected aorta beyond the distal anastomosis with a Djumbodis(®) device system (DDS). Outcomes that were measured included early outcomes, overall mortality from aortic cause and late aortic events including re-interventions. A consecutive series of 134 patients operated on in two participating centers were distributed into study and control groups according to the treatment received: conventional surgery with DDS (DJ group, n=42) or without (control group, n=92).
Operative mortality was 21.4% and 17.6% in the DJ and control groups, respectively (P=0.9), and was within pre-specified alarm lines for both groups. In multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of operative mortality was the presence of any complication (cardiac tamponade or malperfusion, P=0.05), which occurred more in the DJ group (OR =1.3; non-significant). Sixty patients were included into the matched survivors cohorts study (propensity scoring). The aortic event-free survival at 7 years for early survivors was 77%±10% and 48%±11% in the matched DJ group and control group, respectively (HR =0.66). Late mortality from an aortic cause was 10% and 20% in the matched DJ group and control group, respectively (RR =0.5). Actuarial freedom from aortic or vascular interventions was 71%±10% and 67%±9% in the matched DJ and control group, respectively. Operative mortality was not influenced by the use of DDS as compared to conventional surgery alone for TAD.
We observed a trend towards better organ perfusion in the DJ group postoperatively, and more aortic events and deaths of aortic cause in the control group during follow-up.
与单纯传统手术相比,在A型主动脉夹层(TAD)中对主动脉远端进行额外支架置入的有效性尚未得到证实。
我们开展了这项多中心比较研究,以评估使用Djumbodis(®)器械系统(DDS)对夹层主动脉在远端吻合口以外进行顺行裸支架置入的效果。所测量的结果包括早期结果、主动脉病因导致的总体死亡率以及晚期主动脉事件(包括再次干预)。在两个参与中心接受手术的连续134例患者,根据所接受的治疗被分为研究组和对照组:接受DDS的传统手术(DJ组,n = 42)或未接受DDS的传统手术(对照组,n = 92)。
DJ组和对照组的手术死亡率分别为21.4%和17.6%(P = 0.9),且均在两组预先设定的警戒范围内。在多变量分析中,手术死亡率的唯一独立预测因素是是否存在任何并发症(心脏压塞或灌注不良,P = 0.05),DJ组中此类并发症更多见(OR = 1.3;无统计学意义)。60例患者被纳入匹配幸存者队列研究(倾向评分)。在匹配的DJ组和对照组中,早期幸存者7年时无主动脉事件生存率分别为77%±10%和48%±11%(HR = 0.66)。在匹配的DJ组和对照组中,主动脉病因导致的晚期死亡率分别为10%和20%(RR = 0.5)。在匹配的DJ组和对照组中,无主动脉或血管干预的精算生存率分别为71%±10%和67%±9%。与单纯传统手术治疗TAD相比,使用DDS并未影响手术死亡率。
我们观察到DJ组术后器官灌注有改善趋势,而对照组在随访期间出现更多主动脉事件和主动脉病因导致的死亡。