Haemonetics Corporation, 400 Wood Road, Braintree, Massachusetts, 02184.
Dana Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center and Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave, Dana 3, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215.
Am J Hematol. 2016 Dec;91(12):1252-1260. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24543. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
A surge in therapeutic clinical trials over recent years is paving the way for transformative treatment options for patients with hemophilia. The introduction of recombinant factor concentrates in the early 1990s facilitated the use of prophylactic replacement as standard care for hemophilia rather than on-demand treatment. This has revolutionized health outcomes for hemophilia patients, enabling participation in physical activities and reducing debilitating, chronic joint damage. Challenges of prophylactic factor infusion include the frequency of infusions needed to maintain factor levels greater than 1%, patient adherence, reliable intravenous access, and development of neutralizing alloantibodies ("inhibitors"). Novel therapeutics seek to improve upon current factor concentrates by several different mechanisms: (1) extending the half-life of circulating exogenous factor protein, (2) replacing the gene necessary for production of endogenous factor protein, (3) employing bispecific antibody technology to mimic the coagulation function of factor VIII, (4) disrupting anticoagulant proteins, such as tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) or antithrombin (AT3) with antibodies, aptamers, or RNA interference technology. Emerging treatment options may reduce the frequency of (extended half-life products) or eliminate (gene therapy) the need for scheduled factor concentrate infusions, or provide a subcutaneous administration option (bispecific antibody, AT3, and TFPI targeting therapies). In addition, the nonfactor replacement strategies provide a promising treatment option for patients with inhibitors, presently the greatest unmet medical need in hemophilia. This review highlights current and recently completed clinical trials that are driving a paradigm shift in our approach to hemophilia care for patients with and without inhibitors. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1252-1260, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
近年来,治疗性临床试验的激增为血友病患者带来了变革性的治疗选择。20 世纪 90 年代初重组因子浓缩物的引入促进了预防性替代治疗作为血友病的标准护理,而不是按需治疗。这彻底改变了血友病患者的健康状况,使他们能够参与体育活动,并减少致残性慢性关节损伤。预防性因子输注的挑战包括维持因子水平高于 1%所需的输注频率、患者的依从性、可靠的静脉通路和中和性同种异体抗体(“抑制剂”)的产生。新型治疗方法试图通过几种不同的机制来改进现有的因子浓缩物:(1)延长循环外源性因子蛋白的半衰期,(2)替换产生内源性因子蛋白所需的基因,(3)利用双特异性抗体技术模拟因子 VIII 的凝血功能,(4)用抗体、适体或 RNA 干扰技术破坏抗凝蛋白,如组织因子途径抑制剂(TFPI)或抗凝血酶(AT3)。新兴的治疗选择可能会降低(延长半衰期产品)或消除(基因治疗)定期因子浓缩物输注的需求,或提供皮下给药选择(双特异性抗体、AT3 和 TFPI 靶向治疗)。此外,非因子替代策略为抑制剂患者提供了一种有前途的治疗选择,目前这是血友病最大的未满足医疗需求。本综述重点介绍了当前和最近完成的临床试验,这些试验正在推动我们对有和没有抑制剂的血友病患者护理方法的范式转变。Am. J. Hematol. 91:1252-1260, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.