Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Int J Surg. 2016 Oct;34:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.234. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
Displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures (DIACFs) are the most common type of calcaneus fracture. The differences in therapeutic effectiveness between cannulated screw fixation (CSF) and plate fixation are still unclear. Thus, in this meta-analysis, we evaluated the therapeutic effectiveness of these two fixation methods.
We searched for all publications on DIACFs fixated with cannulated screws or plates in the following electronic databases: Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase and CNKI. Only randomized controlled studies were included. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (version 5.1.0) was applied for analysis. The primary outcomes were American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS), improvement of Bohler's angle, improvement of Gissane's angle and the width of the calcaneus. Outcomes were reported as the standard mean difference (SMD) or relative risk (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI). A random effects model was used to assess the pooled data.
Five randomized controlled studies met our inclusion criteria, and a total of 707 patients were involved. There was no statistically significant difference between the cannulated screw fixation group and the plate fixation group in terms of excellent and good AOFAS scores (RR = 1.01, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.13, P = 0.79), improvement of Bohler's angle (SMD = 0.12, 95%CI -0.03 to 0.28, P = 0.12), improvement of Gissane's angle (SMD = 0.09, 95%CI -0.28 to 0.26, P = 0.30), or the width of the calcaneus (SMD = -0.07, 95%CI -0.24 to 0.10, p = 0.45). Compared with plate fixation, CSF showed a significant reduction in the duration of surgery (SMD = -1.74, 95%CI, -3.35 to -0.13, P = 0.03) and rate of complications (RR = 0.25, 95%CI, 0.15 to 0.44, P<0.00001).
Cannulated screw fixation and plate fixation have similar fixation effectiveness and functional outcomes in the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures. Due to the shorter duration of surgery and low rate of complications, cannulated screw fixation is superior to plate fixation. However, further studies are needed to evaluate cannulated screw fixation for various Sanders types of calcaneus fractures.
关节内移位跟骨骨折(DIACFs)是最常见的跟骨骨折类型。套管螺钉固定(CSF)和钢板固定的治疗效果差异仍不清楚。因此,在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了这两种固定方法的治疗效果。
我们在以下电子数据库中搜索了使用套管螺钉或钢板固定 DIACFs 的所有出版物:Pubmed、Cochrane、Embase 和 CNKI。仅纳入随机对照研究。采用 Cochrane 干预系统评价手册(版本 5.1.0)进行分析。主要结局指标为美国矫形足踝协会评分(AOFAS)、Bohler 角改善、Gissane 角改善和跟骨宽度。结果以标准均数差(SMD)或相对风险(RR)及 95%置信区间(CI)表示。采用随机效应模型评估汇总数据。
符合纳入标准的随机对照研究有 5 项,共纳入 707 例患者。套管螺钉固定组与钢板固定组在 AOFAS 评分优秀和良好率(RR=1.01,95%CI 0.91 至 1.13,P=0.79)、Bohler 角改善(SMD=0.12,95%CI-0.03 至 0.28,P=0.12)、Gissane 角改善(SMD=0.09,95%CI-0.28 至 0.26,P=0.30)或跟骨宽度(SMD=-0.07,95%CI-0.24 至 0.10,P=0.45)方面无统计学差异。与钢板固定相比,CSF 手术时间(SMD=-1.74,95%CI-3.35 至-0.13,P=0.03)和并发症发生率(RR=0.25,95%CI 0.15 至 0.44,P<0.00001)显著降低。
套管螺钉固定和钢板固定在治疗关节内移位跟骨骨折方面具有相似的固定效果和功能结局。由于手术时间更短、并发症发生率更低,套管螺钉固定优于钢板固定。然而,需要进一步的研究来评估套管螺钉固定在各种 Sanders 类型跟骨骨折中的应用。