Suppr超能文献

经跗骨窦入路比较微创钢板固定与螺钉固定治疗移位的关节内跟骨骨折的疗效

Comparing less invasive plate fixation versus screw fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture via sinus tarsi approach.

作者信息

Guo Changjun, Xu Yangbo, Li Chunguang, Li Xingchen, Wang Zhengxiang, Cai Ming, Xu Xiangyang

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Department of Orthopaedics, Rui Jin North Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2021 Sep;45(9):2231-2237. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04867-5. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the post-operative radiographic and clinical outcomes of less invasive plate fixation versus screw fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures (DIACFs) via sinus tarsi approach.

METHODS

A total of 165 consecutive DIACFs that underwent open reduction internal fixation via sinus tarsi approach from 2013 to 2018 were reviewed at least a two year follow-up. The methods of fixation were divided into two groups: less invasive plate fixation versus screw fixation of calcaneus fracture (59 vs 106, respectively). The radiographic outcomes including pre- and post-operative Bohler's and Gissane's angles were evaluated. The post-operative function was evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, the Olerud and Molander Scale and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The complications, the rates of implant removal and cost were also compared.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 44.2 months in the plate groups and 47.9 months in the screw groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the Bohler's angle and Gissane's angle between the plate group and screw group during the pre-operation and the last follow-up. There was no significant difference in the final AOFAS score, Olerud and Molander score and VAS score between the two groups (P > 0.05). The total incidence of complications was 6.7% in the plate group and 6.6% in the screw group (P > 0.05). The rates of implant removal and total cost during the hospitalization in the plate group were significantly higher compared with screws group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The less invasive plate fixation versus screw fixation of DIACFs via sinus tarsi approach contributed comparable quality of reduction, complications and post-operative functional outcomes. The less invasive plate technique was significantly higher in terms of implant costs and the rate of implant removal.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较经跗骨窦入路对移位的关节内跟骨骨折(DIACF)采用微创钢板固定与螺钉固定的术后影像学和临床结果。

方法

回顾了2013年至2018年期间共165例经跗骨窦入路切开复位内固定的连续性DIACF病例,至少随访两年。固定方法分为两组:跟骨骨折的微创钢板固定与螺钉固定(分别为59例和106例)。评估了包括术前和术后Bohler角和Gissane角在内的影像学结果。使用美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)后足评分、Olerud和Molander量表以及视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估术后功能。还比较了并发症、内植物取出率和费用。

结果

钢板组平均随访44.2个月,螺钉组平均随访47.9个月(P>0.05)。术前和末次随访时,钢板组和螺钉组之间的Bohler角和Gissane角无显著差异。两组之间的最终AOFAS评分、Olerud和Molander评分以及VAS评分无显著差异(P>0.05)。钢板组并发症总发生率为6.7%,螺钉组为6.6%(P>0.05)。与螺钉组相比,钢板组住院期间的内植物取出率和总费用显著更高(P<0.05)。

结论

经跗骨窦入路对DIACF采用微创钢板固定与螺钉固定在复位质量、并发症和术后功能结果方面相当。微创钢板技术在内植物成本和内植物取出率方面显著更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验