Suppr超能文献

穴位按压对产程及分娩方式影响的Meta分析

Meta-analysis of the effect of acupressure on duration of labor and mode of delivery.

作者信息

Makvandi Somayeh, Mirzaiinajmabadi Khadigeh, Sadeghi Ramin, Mahdavian Mitra, Karimi Leila

机构信息

Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Oct;135(1):5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 Jul 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acupressure is increasing in popularity as an alternative treatment in obstetrics and gynecology.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize and assess evidence regarding the effects of acupressure on duration of labor and mode of delivery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Four major databases and Google Scholar were searched using terms related to labor and acupressure, without language restrictions, up to November 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials were included if they examined the effect of acupressure at any acupoint during childbirth on duration of labor and/or mode of delivery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data. The outcome measures were duration of labor and mode of delivery. Random-effects models were used to pool results.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included in meta-analyses. Acupressure increased the chance of vaginal delivery when compared with placebo/no intervention (odds ratio [OR] 2.329, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.348-4.024, P=0.002; risk difference [RD] 8.9%, 95% CI 2.7%-15.0%, P=0.005). Acupressure decreased the duration of the active phase by 1.310 hours (95% CI -1.738 to -0.882; P<0.001) and the second stage of labor by 5.808 minutes (95% CI -1.615 to -0.807; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Acupressure could have a role in reducing the rate of cesarean delivery and decreasing the duration of labor in parturient women. However, there is a need for more reliable randomized controlled trials.

摘要

背景

穴位按压作为妇产科的一种替代治疗方法,正日益受到欢迎。

目的

总结并评估关于穴位按压对产程和分娩方式影响的证据。

检索策略

截至2015年11月,使用与分娩和穴位按压相关的术语,对四个主要数据库和谷歌学术进行检索,无语言限制。

入选标准

纳入在分娩期间对任何穴位进行穴位按压对产程和/或分娩方式影响的随机对照试验。

数据收集与分析

两名评价者独立提取数据。结局指标为产程和分娩方式。采用随机效应模型汇总结果。

主要结果

13项研究纳入荟萃分析。与安慰剂/无干预相比,穴位按压增加了阴道分娩的机会(优势比[OR]2.329,95%置信区间[CI]1.348 - 4.024,P = 0.002;风险差[RD]8.9%,95%CI 2.7% - 15.0%,P = 0.005)。穴位按压使活跃期缩短1.310小时(95%CI - 1.738至 - 0.882;P < 0.001),第二产程缩短5.808分钟(95%CI - 1.615至 - 0.807;P < 0.001)。

结论

穴位按压可能在降低剖宫产率和缩短产妇产程方面发挥作用。然而,需要更多可靠的随机对照试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验