Ozgoli Giti, Sedigh Mobarakabadi Sedigheh, Heshmat Reza, Alavi Majd Hamid, Sheikhan Zohreh
Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iranian Scientific Acupuncture Association, Tehran, Iran.
Complement Ther Med. 2016 Dec;29:175-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
This study examines and compares the effect of LI4 and BL32 acupressure with each other and control group on labor pain and delivery outcomes.
In this randomized controlled trial, 105 primiparous women in active phase of first-stage of labor were equally assigned to two experimental groups [acupressure on LI4 (n=35) or BL32 (n=35)] and a control group (n=35).
The experimental groups received routine labor care and acupressure in LI4 or BL32 points in three cervical dilatations (4-5, 6-7, and 8-10cm). The control group only received routine labor care.
Pain was assessed by numerical rating scale in three cervical dilatations, before and after intervention. Type of delivery (cesarean, vaginal or operative delivery) and neonatal Apgar score were considered as delivery outcomes, these data collected by a check list. Data were analyzed using Repeated Measurement, ANOVA, Chi-Square, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney tests.
Pain reduction was significantly greater in LI4 and BL32 groups compared with control in all periods of study. Also, acupressure on BL32 point was superior to LI4 point in pain relief in the first and second but not third intervention. No statistically significant difference was observed in terms of delivery outcomes.
Acupressure on BL32 and LI4 points are effective in reducing labor pain compared to control group with a slight superiority for BL32 points. Acupressure on these points could apply for relief pain in labor as an inexpensive and easy to administered method.
本研究探讨并比较针刺合谷穴(LI4)和膀胱经32穴(BL32)以及与对照组相比,对分娩疼痛和分娩结局的影响。
在这项随机对照试验中,105名处于第一产程活跃期的初产妇被平均分为两个试验组[针刺合谷穴(n = 35)或膀胱经32穴(n = 35)]和一个对照组(n = 35)。
试验组在宫颈扩张三个阶段(4 - 5cm、6 - 7cm和8 - 10cm)接受常规分娩护理并针刺合谷穴或膀胱经32穴。对照组仅接受常规分娩护理。
在干预前后,通过数字评分量表在宫颈扩张三个阶段评估疼痛程度。分娩类型(剖宫产、阴道分娩或手术助产)和新生儿阿氏评分被视为分娩结局,这些数据通过检查表收集。使用重复测量、方差分析、卡方检验、Kruskal - Wallis检验和Mann - Whitney检验对数据进行分析。
在研究的所有阶段,合谷穴组和膀胱经32穴组的疼痛减轻程度均显著大于对照组。此外,在第一次和第二次干预中,针刺膀胱经32穴在缓解疼痛方面优于合谷穴,但第三次干预时并非如此。在分娩结局方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异。
与对照组相比,针刺膀胱经32穴和合谷穴在减轻分娩疼痛方面有效,且膀胱经32穴略占优势。针刺这些穴位可作为一种廉价且易于实施的方法用于缓解分娩疼痛。