Shorr Andrew F, Zilberberg Marya D, Wang Li, Baser Onur, Yu Holly
1Washington Hospital Center,Washington,DC.
2EviMed Research Group,Goshen,Massachusetts.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;37(11):1331-1336. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.188. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
OBJECTIVE To examine attributable mortality and costs of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in the Medicare population. DESIGN A population-based cohort study among US adults aged at least 65 years in the 2008-2010 Medicare 5% sample, with follow-up of 12 months. PATIENTS Incident CDI episode was defined by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code of 008.45 and no other occurrences within the preceding 12 months. To quantify the adjusted mortality and costs we developed a 1:1 propensity-matched sample of CDI and non-CDI patients. RESULTS Among 1,165,165 patients included, 6,838 (0.6%) had a CDI episode in 2009 (82.5% healthcare-associated). Patients with CDI were older (mean [SD] age, 81.0±8.0 vs 77.0±7.7 years, P<.001), were more likely to come from the Northeast (27.4% vs 18.6%, P<.001), and had a higher comorbidity burden (Charlson score, 4.6±3.3 vs 1.7±2.1, P<.001). Hospitalizations (63.2% vs 6.0%, P<.001) and antibiotics (33.9% vs 12.5%, P<.001) within the prior 90 days were more common in the group with CDI. In the propensity-adjusted analysis, CDI was associated with near doubling of both mortality (42.6% vs 23.4%, P<.001) and total healthcare costs ($64,807±$66,480 vs $38,128±$46,485, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Among elderly patients, CDI is associated with an increase in adjusted mortality and healthcare costs following a CDI episode. Nationwide annually this equals 240,000 patients with CDI, 46,000 potential deaths, and more than $6 billion in costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1-6.
目的 研究医疗保险人群中艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的可归因死亡率和成本。设计 一项基于人群的队列研究,研究对象为2008 - 2010年医疗保险5%样本中年龄至少65岁的美国成年人,随访12个月。患者 新发CDI发作由国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本代码008.45定义,且在之前12个月内无其他此类发作。为了量化调整后的死亡率和成本,我们构建了CDI患者与非CDI患者1:1倾向匹配样本。结果 在纳入的1,165,165名患者中,6,838名(0.6%)在2009年发生了CDI发作(82.5%与医疗保健相关)。CDI患者年龄更大(平均[标准差]年龄,81.0±8.0岁对77.0±7.7岁,P<0.001),更有可能来自东北部(27.4%对18.6%,P<0.001),且合并症负担更高(查尔森评分,4.6±3.3对1.7±2.1,P<0.001)。在CDI组中,前90天内的住院率(63.2%对6.0%,P<0.001)和抗生素使用率(33.9%对12.5%,P<0.001)更高。在倾向调整分析中**,CDI与死亡率(42.6%对23.4%,P<0.001)和总医疗保健成本(64,807美元±66,480美元对38,128美元±46,485美元,P<0.001)几乎翻倍相关。结论 在老年患者中,CDI发作后与调整后的死亡率增加和医疗保健成本增加相关。在全国范围内,每年这相当于240,000例CDI患者、46,000例潜在死亡以及超过60亿美元的成本。《感染控制与医院流行病学》2016年;1 - 6。 (注:原文中“在倾向调整分析中,**CDI与死亡率(42.6%对23.4%,P<0.001)和总医疗保健成本(64,807美元±66,480美元对38,128美元±46,485美元,P<0.001)几乎翻倍相关。”一句中“几乎翻倍相关”表述存疑,可能原文想表达的是“显著增加相关”之类更准确的意思,但按照要求未做修改。)