Suppr超能文献

对感染的实际医疗资源使用和成本的系统评价。

A systematic review of real-world healthcare resource use and costs of infections.

作者信息

Malone Daniel C, Armstrong Edward P, Gratie Dan, Pham Sissi V, Amin Alpesh

机构信息

Strategic Therapeutics, LLC, Tucson, Arizona.

University of Utah College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, Utah.

出版信息

Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Jan 17;3(1):e17. doi: 10.1017/ash.2022.369. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of published real-world evidence describing the cost and healthcare resource use for infection (CDI) in the United States.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted searching for terms for CDI and healthcare costs. Titles of articles and abstracts were reviewed to identify those that met study criteria. Studies were evaluated to examine overall design and comparison groups in terms of healthcare resource use and cost for CDI.

RESULTS

In total, 28 articles met the inclusion criteria. Moreover, 20 studies evaluated primary CDI or did not specify, and 8 studies evaluated both primary CDI and recurrent (rCDI). Data from Medicare were used in 6 studies. Nearly all studies used a comparison group, either controls without CDI (N = 20) or comparison between primary CDI and rCDI (N = 7). Two studies examined costs of rCDI by the number of recurrences. Overall, the burden of CDI is significant, with higher aggregate costs for patients with rCDI. Compared with non-CDI controls, hospital length of stay increased in patients with both primary and rCDI compared to patients without CDI. Patients with primary CDI cost healthcare systems $24,000 more than patients without CDI. Additionally, 2 studies that evaluated the impact of recurrence among those patients with an index case of CDI demonstrated significantly higher direct all-cause medical costs among those with rCDI compared to those without.

CONCLUSION

CDI, and particularly rCDI, is a costly condition with hospitalizations being the main cost driver.

摘要

目的

对已发表的描述美国艰难梭菌感染(CDI)成本和医疗资源使用情况的真实世界证据进行系统评价。

方法

进行系统的文献综述,搜索CDI和医疗成本相关术语。对文章标题和摘要进行审查,以确定符合研究标准的文章。对研究进行评估,以检查在CDI的医疗资源使用和成本方面的总体设计和比较组。

结果

共有28篇文章符合纳入标准。此外,20项研究评估了原发性CDI或未明确说明,8项研究同时评估了原发性CDI和复发性(rCDI)。6项研究使用了医疗保险数据。几乎所有研究都使用了比较组,要么是没有CDI的对照组(N = 20),要么是原发性CDI和rCDI之间的比较(N = 7)。两项研究按复发次数检查了rCDI的成本。总体而言,CDI的负担很重,rCDI患者的总费用更高。与非CDI对照组相比,原发性和rCDI患者的住院时间均比无CDI患者延长。原发性CDI患者比无CDI患者给医疗系统多带来24,000美元的成本。此外,两项评估CDI索引病例患者复发影响的研究表明,rCDI患者的直接全因医疗成本明显高于无rCDI患者。

结论

CDI,尤其是rCDI,是一种成本高昂的疾病,住院是主要的成本驱动因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bfc4/9879868/20b47c3b0ac0/S2732494X22003692_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验