Ratwani Raj M, Hettinger A Zachary, Fairbanks Rollin J
National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health, and Department of Emergency Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e191-e193. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw117.
Despite the widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), usability of many EHRs continues to be suboptimal, with some vendors failing to meet usability standards, resulting in clinician frustration and patient safety hazards. In an effort to increase EHR vendor competition on usability, recommendations have been made and legislation drafted to develop comparison tools that would allow purchasers to better understand the usability of EHR products prior to purchase. Usability comparison can be based on EHR vendor design and development processes, vendor usability testing as part of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology certification program, and usability of implemented products. Barriers exist within the current certified health technology program that prevent effective comparison of usability during each of these stages. We describe the importance of providing purchasers with improved information about EHR usability, barriers to making usability comparisons, and solutions to overcome these barriers.
尽管电子健康记录(EHRs)已被广泛采用,但许多EHRs的可用性仍不尽人意,一些供应商未能达到可用性标准,导致临床医生感到沮丧,并对患者安全构成威胁。为了增强EHR供应商在可用性方面的竞争,人们已提出相关建议并起草了立法,以开发比较工具,使购买者在购买前能更好地了解EHR产品的可用性。可用性比较可以基于EHR供应商的设计和开发流程、作为卫生信息技术国家协调员办公室认证计划一部分的供应商可用性测试,以及已实施产品的可用性。当前的认证健康技术计划存在一些障碍,阻碍了在这些阶段中的每个阶段对可用性进行有效比较。我们阐述了向购买者提供有关EHR可用性的改进信息的重要性、进行可用性比较的障碍以及克服这些障碍的解决方案。