MedStar Health National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Apr 23;28(5):1029-1031. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa329.
Despite basic federal requirements promoting a user-centered design approach to electronic health record (EHR) development and usability testing there have been usability and safety risks with EHR technology. Four EHR vendors were asked to provide written descriptions of their usability practices, and we reviewed these descriptions to identify areas where there has been advancement and areas for improvement. All 4 vendors described user-centered design processes and usability testing methods that demonstrate advancement from previous studies of vendor practices. Importantly, vendors are also beginning to address aspects of EHR implementation that play a critical role in shaping EHR usability. There are important areas for improvement in vendor practices including a greater focus on safety and on measurement and benchmarking. Vendors sharing their current usability practices demonstrates a step toward greater transparency which has typically been lacking.
尽管联邦政府有基本要求,提倡采用以用户为中心的方法来设计电子健康记录 (EHR) 并进行可用性测试,但 EHR 技术仍然存在可用性和安全性风险。我们要求四家 EHR 供应商提供有关其可用性实践的书面说明,并对这些说明进行了审查,以确定在哪些方面取得了进展,以及在哪些方面需要改进。这四家供应商都描述了用户为中心的设计流程和可用性测试方法,这些方法表明它们在以前的供应商实践研究中取得了进步。重要的是,供应商也开始解决在塑造 EHR 可用性方面发挥关键作用的 EHR 实施方面的问题。供应商的实践中有一些重要的改进领域,包括更加关注安全性以及度量和基准测试。供应商分享其当前的可用性实践表明,透明度有所提高,而这在以前通常是缺乏的。