Pittman Meredith E, Khararjian Armen, Wood Laura D, Montgomery Elizabeth A, Voltaggio Lysandra
Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287.
Hum Pathol. 2016 Dec;58:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.07.031. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
Despite the recommendation of expert gastrointestinal pathologists, private and academic centers (including our own) have continued to use ancillary stains for identification of Helicobacter pylori. For a 1-month period, gastric biopsies were prospectively evaluated for H pylori using routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and a reflex Diff-Quik stain. During this time, 379 gastric biopsies were collected on 326 patients. H pylori organisms were prospectively identified in 23 (7%) patients, all of whom had superficial dense lymphoplasmacytic inflammation expanding the lamina propria. An additional 2 patients with neutrophilic inflammation were found to have H pylori by immunohistochemical staining. One patient diagnosed as having normal gastric mucosa was retrospectively found to have inflammation with rare H pylori organisms originally overlooked on both H&E and Diff-Quik but later identified on immunostain (0.5%). No patients with chemical gastritis (16%) or chronic inflammation (27%) were found to have H pylori. During the study month, 9 immunostains for H pylori were performed in addition to the 379 Diff-Quik. After discontinuation of reflex Diff-Quik, approximately 20 immunostains are performed for H pylori each month, which decreases technical time spent for processing gastric biopsies and reduces cost to the health care system. In our population with a low prevalence of H pylori, reflex staining for organisms is not cost-effective. The organisms can be seen on routine H&E; when suspicious superficial or active inflammation is present without visible organisms, immunohistochemical stains will confirm presence or absence within a day. Discontinuation of up-front ancillary studies is cost-effective without compromising patient care.
尽管有胃肠病理专家的建议,但私立和学术中心(包括我们自己的中心)仍继续使用辅助染色来鉴定幽门螺杆菌。在为期1个月的时间里,我们前瞻性地使用常规苏木精和伊红(H&E)染色以及一种补充的Diff-Quik染色对胃活检标本进行幽门螺杆菌评估。在此期间,共收集了326例患者的379份胃活检标本。前瞻性地在23例(7%)患者中鉴定出幽门螺杆菌,所有这些患者的黏膜固有层均有浅表致密的淋巴浆细胞炎症。另外2例有中性粒细胞炎症的患者通过免疫组化染色发现有幽门螺杆菌。一名最初被诊断为胃黏膜正常的患者经回顾性检查发现存在炎症,有罕见的幽门螺杆菌,最初在H&E染色和Diff-Quik染色中均被遗漏,但后来在免疫染色中被发现(0.5%)。未发现化学性胃炎患者(16%)或慢性炎症患者(27%)有幽门螺杆菌。在研究月期间,除了379次Diff-Quik染色外,还进行了9次幽门螺杆菌免疫染色。停止补充Diff-Quik染色后,每月大约进行20次幽门螺杆菌免疫染色,这减少了处理胃活检标本所花费的技术时间,并降低了医疗保健系统的成本。在我们这个幽门螺杆菌感染率较低的人群中,对幽门螺杆菌进行补充染色并不具有成本效益。在常规H&E染色中就能看到幽门螺杆菌;当存在可疑的浅表或活动性炎症但未见菌体时,免疫组化染色可在一天内确认是否存在幽门螺杆菌。停止预先进行的辅助检查具有成本效益,且不会影响患者护理。