Wright Cheryl L, Kelly James K
Department of Anatomic Pathology, Royal Jubilee Hospital, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2006 Mar;30(3):357-61. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000184808.45661.cb.
Helicobacter pylori and intestinal metaplasia (IM) are readily seen in hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of gastric and/or esophageal biopsies, yet many pathology laboratories perform routine special stains on all of these biopsies. We wished to determine if special stains are necessary for every single gastric and/or esophageal biopsy. We prospectively studied 613 gastric and/or esophageal biopsies from 494 consecutive patients. The slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, toluidine blue (TB) for H. pylori, and Alcian blue (AB) for IM. The hematoxylin and eosin slide was classed as positive or negative for H. pylori and IM. Then it was determined if the case needed a TB or AB stain. A total of 436 cases (71.1%) were identified as H. pylori-negative and not needing a TB stain, and none was TB+. A total of 126 (20.6%) of hematoxylin and eosin slides were inconclusive for H. pylori and were regarded as needing a TB stain. Twenty of these (15.9%) were TB+. Fifty-one biopsies (8.3%) were regarded as H. pylori+ on hematoxylin and eosin; the TB stain was also positive in 49. IM was present in 113 (18.4%) hematoxylin and eosin biopsies. Hematoxylin and eosin slides were IM-negative in 498 cases (81.2%). The AB stain revealed rare goblet cells in 3 of 498 cases (0.6%). Only one of those biopsies was esophageal, and that had one goblet cell that was missed on hematoxylin and eosin. Only 2 (0.3%) were regarded as needing an AB stain. We conclude that routine special stains for all gastric and/or esophageal biopsies are not required, and hematoxylin and eosin assessment combined with selective ordering of these stains will identify virtually all cases of H. pylori gastritis and intestinal metaplasia.
在胃和/或食管活检组织的苏木精-伊红染色切片中很容易看到幽门螺杆菌和肠化生(IM),然而许多病理实验室对所有这些活检组织都进行常规特殊染色。我们希望确定对每一份胃和/或食管活检组织是否都有必要进行特殊染色。我们对494例连续患者的613份胃和/或食管活检组织进行了前瞻性研究。切片用苏木精-伊红染色、甲苯胺蓝(TB)染色检测幽门螺杆菌以及阿尔辛蓝(AB)染色检测肠化生。将苏木精-伊红染色切片判定为幽门螺杆菌和肠化生阳性或阴性。然后确定该病例是否需要TB或AB染色。总共436例(71.1%)被判定为幽门螺杆菌阴性且不需要TB染色,没有TB阳性病例。总共126份(20.6%)苏木精-伊红染色切片对幽门螺杆菌的判定不明确,被视为需要TB染色。其中20例(15.9%)为TB阳性。51份活检组织(8.3%)在苏木精-伊红染色切片上被判定为幽门螺杆菌阳性;TB染色也为阳性的有49例。113份(18.4%)苏木精-伊红染色的活检组织存在肠化生。498例(81.2%)苏木精-伊红染色切片为肠化生阴性。AB染色显示在498例中有3例(0.6%)有罕见杯状细胞。其中只有1份活检组织是食管的,并且在苏木精-伊红染色切片上遗漏了1个杯状细胞。只有2例(0.3%)被视为需要AB染色。我们得出结论,并非所有胃和/或食管活检组织都需要常规特殊染色,苏木精-伊红评估结合这些染色的选择性送检几乎可以识别所有幽门螺杆菌胃炎和肠化生病例。