Kirschbaum Andreas, Hemmerling Stefanie, Steinfeldt Thorsten, Bartsch Detlef K, Mirow Nikolas
Department of Visceral, Thoracic und Vascular Surgery, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Eur Surg Res. 2017;58(1-2):20-26. doi: 10.1159/000447966. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
After resection of the carina with a length of more than 4 cm, anastomoses often need to be performed under tension despite maximum mobilization. If the patient cannot be extubated, the anastomosis remains under continued stress. Anastomoses of the carina can be constructed using various suture techniques, including single interrupted sutures, back wall running but front wall single interrupted sutures, and complete running suture. This experimental study was designed to determine the most tensile stress-resistant anastomotic suture technique.
Isolated preparations of tracheobronchial trees were recovered from freshly slaughtered pigs. Resection of the carina was carried out in preparation of the experiments. After blind randomization, anastomoses (n = 15 per group) between the distal trachea and the proximal left main bronchus were performed with PDS 4-0 employing three different suture techniques: (1) single interrupted sutures, (2) back wall running but front wall single interrupted sutures (= mixed technique), and (3) complete running suture. The anastomotic specimen was fixed onto a specially constructed device. The tracheal end was intubated with a tube (CH 8.0) and connected to a respirator. Different weights were attached to the distal end of the preparation via a clamp and guide rollers. Airtightness was investigated at the following tensile loads: 0, 500, 1,000 and 1,500 g. Intrabronchial pressure was increased in 5-mbar steps. In an underwater trial, we analyzed whether anastomoses were airtight at a maximum intrabronchial ventilation pressure of 70 mbar.
At an intrabronchial pressure of 25 mbar without tensile stress, all anastomoses were initially airtight. In tensionless anastomoses at 70 mbar, 100% of single interrupted and continuous sutures were airtight, as compared to 80% of sutures in mixed technique. At 70 mbar and tensile loads of 1,500 g, 80% of single interrupted sutures, 60% of sutures in mixed technique and 53% of the running sutures remained competent.
If tracheal anastomoses can be performed without tension, the suture technique is not important. With increased tension, anastomoses performed in single interrupted suture technique were clearly superior. Thus, in situations, where high tensile stress is to be expected, single interrupted sutures should be preferred.
切除长度超过4 cm的隆突后,即便进行了最大限度的游离,吻合口往往仍需在张力下进行缝合。如果患者无法拔管,吻合口就会持续承受压力。隆突吻合可采用多种缝合技术构建,包括单间断缝合、后壁连续缝合但前壁单间断缝合以及全连续缝合。本实验研究旨在确定最具抗张应力能力的吻合口缝合技术。
从刚屠宰的猪身上获取气管支气管树的离体标本。为进行实验,先对隆突进行切除。经盲法随机分组后,使用4-0的聚对二氧环己酮缝线,采用三种不同的缝合技术对远端气管与近端左主支气管进行吻合(每组15例):(1)单间断缝合;(2)后壁连续缝合但前壁单间断缝合(=混合技术);(3)全连续缝合。将吻合标本固定在特制装置上。气管端插入一根导管(内径8.0)并连接至呼吸机。通过夹具和导轮在标本远端施加不同重量。在以下张应力负荷下研究吻合口的气密性:0、500、1000和1500 g。以5 mbar的步长增加支气管内压力。在水下试验中,我们分析了在最大支气管内通气压力为70 mbar时吻合口是否气密。
在支气管内压力为25 mbar且无张应力时,所有吻合口最初均气密。在支气管内压力为70 mbar的无张力吻合中,100%的单间断缝合和连续缝合吻合口保持气密,相比之下,混合技术的缝合吻合口气密率为80%。在支气管内压力为70 mbar且张应力负荷为1500 g时,80%的单间断缝合吻合口、60%的混合技术缝合吻合口和53%的连续缝合吻合口仍保持完好。
如果气管吻合能够在无张力的情况下进行,缝合技术并不重要。随着张力增加,采用单间断缝合技术的吻合口明显更具优势。因此,在预期会有高张应力的情况下,应优先选择单间断缝合。