Suppr超能文献

心房颤动患者中使用非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂的治疗变化

Treatment Changes among Users of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation.

作者信息

Hellfritzsch Maja, Husted Steen Elkjaer, Grove Erik Lerkevang, Rasmussen Lotte, Poulsen Birgitte Klindt, Johnsen Søren Paaske, Hallas Jesper, Pottegård Anton

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Unit West, Herning, Denmark.

出版信息

Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Feb;120(2):187-194. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12664. Epub 2016 Oct 28.

Abstract

Patients with atrial fibrillation discontinuing anticoagulant therapy are left unprotected against ischaemic stroke. Further, switching between oral anticoagulants may be associated with a transiently increased risk of bleeding or thromboembolism. However, there is a paucity of real-life data on pattern of switching and discontinuation of oral anticoagulants. To address this, we conducted a nationwide drug utilization study including all registered Danish atrial fibrillation patients initiating a non-VKA oral anticoagulant (NOAC) between August 2011 and February 2016. We assessed changes in anticoagulant treatment, including switching between oral anticoagulants and discontinuation of NOACs, and explored patient characteristics predicting these changes. We identified 50,632 patients with atrial fibrillation initiating NOAC therapy within the study period. The majority initiated dabigatran (49.9%) and one-third had previously used VKA. Within 1 year, 10.1% switched to VKA, 4.8% switched to another NOAC and 14.4% discontinued treatment. The frequencies of switching to VKA and discontinuation were highest among NOAC users of young age (<55 years) and with low CHA DS -VASc score (=0). However, the majority of patients (87.3%) stopping NOAC treatment had a CHA DS -VASc score ≥1. We conclude that switching from VKA to NOAC, and to a lesser extent from NOAC to VKA, is common, as is early treatment discontinuation. The majority of treatment changes are observed in patients at increased risk of stroke. More research is warranted on the risks of bleeding and thromboembolism associated with switching and discontinuation of NOACs as well as the underlying reasons why these treatment changes occur.

摘要

房颤患者停用抗凝治疗后,在预防缺血性卒中方面就失去了保护。此外,在口服抗凝剂之间切换可能会短暂增加出血或血栓栓塞的风险。然而,关于口服抗凝剂切换和停用模式的真实数据很少。为了解决这一问题,我们开展了一项全国性药物使用研究,纳入了2011年8月至2016年2月期间所有开始使用非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOAC)的丹麦房颤登记患者。我们评估了抗凝治疗的变化,包括口服抗凝剂之间的切换和NOAC的停用,并探讨了预测这些变化的患者特征。我们确定了50632例在研究期间开始NOAC治疗的房颤患者。大多数患者开始使用达比加群(49.9%),三分之一的患者之前使用过维生素K拮抗剂。在1年内,10.1%的患者切换为维生素K拮抗剂,4.8%的患者切换为另一种NOAC,14.4%的患者停止治疗。在年龄较小(<55岁)且CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分=0的NOAC使用者中,切换为维生素K拮抗剂和停药的频率最高。然而,大多数停止NOAC治疗的患者(87.3%)CHA₂DS₂-VASc评分≥1。我们得出结论,从维生素K拮抗剂切换到NOAC,以及在较小程度上从NOAC切换到维生素K拮抗剂,以及早期停药都很常见。大多数治疗变化发生在卒中风险增加的患者中。有必要进一步研究与NOAC切换和停用相关的出血和血栓栓塞风险,以及这些治疗变化发生的潜在原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验