De Luca Leonardo, Dovizio Melania, Sangiorgi Diego, Perrone Valentina, Degli Esposti Luca
Department of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Sciences, A.O. San Camillo-Forlanini, 00151 Rome, Italy.
Department of Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Medicine and Surgery, U.O.C. Cardiologia, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini Circonvallazione Gianicolense, 87, 00152 Roma, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 19;12(6):2379. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062379.
In the last decade, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have emerged as prominent therapeutic options in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). We analysed the clinical burden and the switching rate between all available NOACs, and their dosage change over a period of 5 years in a representative population of patients with NVAF aged between 70 and 75 years. Methods and Results: This is a retrospective observational study on administrative databases, covering approximately 6.2 million health-assisted individuals by the Italian National Health System (around 11% of the entire Italian residents). Out of 4640 NVAF patients treated with NOACs and aged 70-75 years in 2017, 3772 (81.3%) patients were still in treatment with NOAC up to 2021 and among them, 3389 (73.0%) patients remained in treatment with the same NOAC during 2017-2021. In fact, 10.2% of patients switched NOAC type and 10.3% changed the dose of the same NOAC. Overall, after switching, the dabigatran and rivaroxaban groups lost, respectively, 13.5% and 2.8% of patients, while apixaban and edoxaban resulted in a relative percentage increase of 6.8% and 44.6% of patients, respectively. By a logistic regression analysis, the treatment with rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban (respect to dabigatran) was associated with a significant risk reduction of switch of 57%, 68%, and 44%, respectively. On the other hand, several features of high risk were associated with dose reduction. Conclusions. In our 5-year analysis of a large administrative database, a switching among NOACs or a change in NOAC dosages occurred in around 20% of elderly patients with NVAF. The type of NOAC was associated with a high switching rate, while several characteristics of high risk resulted as predictors of dose reduction of NOACs. Moreover, a worsening trend of clinical conditions occurred in patients maintaining the same NOAC treatment across 2017-2021.
在过去十年中,新型口服抗凝药(NOACs)已成为非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)的重要治疗选择。我们分析了所有可用NOACs之间的临床负担和转换率,以及在年龄在70至75岁的代表性NVAF患者群体中,其在5年期间的剂量变化。方法与结果:这是一项基于行政数据库的回顾性观察研究,涵盖了意大利国家卫生系统约620万接受医疗救助的个体(约占意大利全部居民的11%)。在2017年接受NOACs治疗且年龄在70 - 75岁的4640例NVAF患者中,到2021年仍有3772例(81.3%)患者继续接受NOACs治疗,其中3389例(73.0%)患者在2017 - 2021年期间继续使用同一种NOACs治疗。实际上,10.2%的患者更换了NOACs类型,10.3%的患者改变了同一种NOACs的剂量。总体而言,更换后,达比加群和利伐沙班组分别有13.5%和2.8%的患者流失,而阿哌沙班和依度沙班组患者相对百分比分别增加了6.8%和44.6%。通过逻辑回归分析,与达比加群相比,使用利伐沙班、阿哌沙班和依度沙班治疗分别使换药风险显著降低57%、68%和44%。另一方面,一些高风险特征与剂量减少相关。结论。在我们对一个大型行政数据库的5年分析中,约20%的老年NVAF患者发生了NOACs之间的换药或NOACs剂量的改变。NOACs的类型与高换药率相关,而一些高风险特征是NOACs剂量减少的预测因素。此外,在2017 - 2021年期间维持相同NOACs治疗的患者临床状况有恶化趋势。