Oizumi Takefumi, Yamaguchi Kouji, Sato Koichiro, Takahashi Masato, Yoshimura Gen, Otsuru Hiroshi, Tsuchiya Masahiro, Hagiwara Yoshihiro, Itoi Eiji, Sugawara Shunji, Takahashi Tetsu, Endo Yasuo
Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Dentistry, Tohoku University.
Biol Pharm Bull. 2016;39(9):1549-54. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b16-00041.
Bisphosphonate (BP)-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) can occur when enhanced bone-resorptive diseases are treated with nitrogen-containing BPs (N-BPs). Having previously found, in mice, that the non-N-BP etidronate can (i) reduce the inflammatory/necrotic effects of N-BPs by inhibiting their intracellular entry and (ii) antagonize the binding of N-BPs to bone hydroxyapatite, we hypothesized that etidronate-replacement therapy (Eti-RT) might be useful for patients with, or at risk of, BRONJ. In the present study we examined this hypothesis. In each of 25 patients receiving N-BP treatment, the N-BP was discontinued when BRONJ was suspected and/or diagnosed. After consultation with the physician-in-charge and with the patient's informed consent, Eti-RT was instituted in one group according to its standard oral prescription. We retrospectively compared this Eti-RT group (11 patients) with a non-Eti-RT group (14 patients). The Eti-RT group (6 oral N-BP patients and 5 intravenous N-BP patients) and the non-Eti-RT group (5 oral N-BP patients and 9 intravenous N-BP patients) were all stage 2-3 BRONJ. Both in oral and intravenous N-BP patients (particularly in the former patients), Eti-RT promoted or tended to promote the separation and removal of sequestra and thereby promoted the recovery of soft-tissues, allowing them to cover the exposed jawbone. These results suggest that Eti-RT may be an effective choice for BRONJ caused by either oral or intravenous N-BPs and for BRONJ prevention, while retaining a level of anti-bone-resorption. Eti-RT may also be effective at preventing BRONJ in N-BP-treated patients at risk of BRONJ. However, prospective trials are still required.
当用含氮双膦酸盐(N-BPs)治疗骨吸收增强疾病时,可能会发生双膦酸盐(BP)相关的颌骨坏死(BRONJ)。我们之前在小鼠中发现,非N-BP依替膦酸盐可以(i)通过抑制N-BPs进入细胞内来降低其炎症/坏死作用,以及(ii)拮抗N-BPs与骨羟基磷灰石的结合,因此我们推测依替膦酸盐替代疗法(Eti-RT)可能对患有BRONJ或有BRONJ风险的患者有用。在本研究中,我们检验了这一假设。在25例接受N-BP治疗的患者中,当怀疑和/或诊断为BRONJ时,停用N-BP。在与主管医生协商并获得患者知情同意后,一组患者根据标准口服处方开始Eti-RT治疗。我们回顾性地将这个Eti-RT组(11例患者)与非Eti-RT组(14例患者)进行了比较。Eti-RT组(6例口服N-BP患者和5例静脉注射N-BP患者)和非Eti-RT组(5例口服N-BP患者和9例静脉注射N-BP患者)均为2-3期BRONJ。无论是口服还是静脉注射N-BP的患者(尤其是前者),Eti-RT都促进或倾向于促进死骨的分离和清除,从而促进软组织的恢复,使其能够覆盖暴露的颌骨。这些结果表明,Eti-RT可能是由口服或静脉注射N-BPs引起的BRONJ以及BRONJ预防的有效选择,同时保持一定水平的抗骨吸收作用。Eti-RT在预防有BRONJ风险的N-BP治疗患者发生BRONJ方面可能也有效。然而,仍需要进行前瞻性试验。