Suppr超能文献

[急性冠状动脉综合征患者的直接多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:少即是多?]

[Immediate multivessel PCI in patients with ACS : Is less more?].

作者信息

Zeymer U, Zahn R

机构信息

Medizinische Klinik B, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstr. 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland.

出版信息

Herz. 2016 Nov;41(7):566-571. doi: 10.1007/s00059-016-4473-x.

Abstract

Approximately 50 % of hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and up to 80 % of patients with infarction-related cardiogenic shock have multivessel coronary artery disease. The optimal revascularization strategy in these patients has still not been defined. Following successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion, immediate PCI of all additional lesions or staged PCI, after invasive or non-invasive proof of ischemia or conservative therapy can be considered. Randomized studies have demonstrated a clinical benefit of immediate or staged multivessel PCI compared to a conservative approach. So far there are no randomized studies available comparing immediate versus staged PCI. The data regarding the optimal strategy in patients with cardiogenic shock show low concordance. The currently running CULPRIT shock study will help to define the optimal strategy in shock patients. This manuscript summarizes the current knowledge and data and provides recommendations for the clinical practice.

摘要

约50%血流动力学稳定的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者以及高达80%的梗死相关心源性休克患者患有多支冠状动脉疾病。这些患者的最佳血运重建策略仍未明确。在对罪犯病变成功进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,可考虑对所有其他病变立即进行PCI或在有创或无创证实缺血或进行保守治疗后进行分期PCI。随机研究表明,与保守治疗相比,立即或分期进行多支血管PCI具有临床益处。到目前为止,尚无比较立即PCI与分期PCI的随机研究。关于心源性休克患者最佳策略的数据一致性较低。目前正在进行的CULPRIT休克研究将有助于确定休克患者的最佳策略。本文总结了当前的知识和数据,并为临床实践提供建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验