Yang Bin, Zheng Chunyan, Yu Haichu, Zhang Rui, Li Shan, Len Min, Cai Shanglang
Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Medical Consultation Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Iran J Public Health. 2020 Feb;49(2):240-248.
We aimed to compare the efficacy between clopidogrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and their effects on IL-6.
A retrospective analysis and collection of 200 ACS patients diagnosed by the Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China in 2016 were performed. Patients were randomly divided into clopidogrel group and ticagrelor group. Data of left ventricular ejection fraction and ACS clinical classification before PCI, PCI treatment, IL-6, platelet aggregation status, maximum platelet aggregation rate (MPAR), P2Y12 response unit (PRU) and adverse reaction of patients were collected. After PCI, patients were followed up for 1 year to compare the ischemia after treatment between clopidogrel group and tigravilol group.
MPAR and PRU after PCI of clopidogrel group were significantly higher than those of ticagrelor group (<0.05). The expression of IL-6 in two groups peaked at 1 day after PCI and then decreased. That of ticagrelor group was consistently lower than that of clopidogrel group (<0.05). The incidence of ischemic events after treatment in clopidogrel group was significantly higher than that in ticagrelor group (<0.001).
Compared with clopidogrel, tigerrilol had more significant inhibition of platelet aggregation after PCI in ACS patients, and tigerrilol had better effect after interventional treatment in ACS patients. In addition, compared with clopidogrel, tegrel can significantly inhibit the expression of IL-6 in patients with ACS and better alleviate the inflammatory response after PCI.
我们旨在比较氯吡格雷和替格瑞洛在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中的疗效及其对白细胞介素-6(IL-6)的影响。
对2016年在中国青岛青岛大学附属医院心内科确诊的200例ACS患者进行回顾性分析和数据收集。患者被随机分为氯吡格雷组和替格瑞洛组。收集患者PCI术前左心室射血分数和ACS临床分类、PCI治疗、IL-6、血小板聚集状态、最大血小板聚集率(MPAR)、P2Y12反应单位(PRU)及不良反应等数据。PCI术后对患者进行1年随访,比较氯吡格雷组和替格瑞洛组治疗后的缺血情况。
氯吡格雷组PCI术后的MPAR和PRU显著高于替格瑞洛组(<0.05)。两组IL-6表达均在PCI术后1天达到峰值,随后下降。替格瑞洛组IL-6表达始终低于氯吡格雷组(<0.05)。氯吡格雷组治疗后缺血事件发生率显著高于替格瑞洛组(<0.001)。
与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛对ACS患者PCI术后血小板聚集的抑制作用更显著,对ACS患者介入治疗后的效果更好。此外,与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛可显著抑制ACS患者IL-6的表达,更好地减轻PCI术后的炎症反应。