Li Donghai, Yang Zhouyuan, Kang Pengde, Xie Xiaowei
From the Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jun;96(6):440-447. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000621.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of home-based with those of hospital-based rehabilitation on patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials; the studies were assessed with the modified Jadad scale. Ten trials involving 1240 patients were eligible for meta-analysis.
The results revealed that home-based rehabilitation is not inferior to hospital-based rehabilitation according to the total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index score, physical function, stiffness, walk test, and Oxford Knee Score at 12 or 52 weeks after TKA (P > 0.05). Neither pain nor knee flexion range of motion differed between the groups in the first 12 weeks. Unexpectedly, the pain score in the hospital-based group was better than that in the home-based group (P < 0.05), whereas the knee flexion range of motion in the home-based group was superior to that in the hospital-based group (P < 0.05) at 52 weeks. The meta-analysis revealed that the 2 rehabilitation programs have similar costs (P > 0.05).
Home-based rehabilitation after primary TKA was comparable to hospital-based rehabilitation and thus is a significant alternative for patients.
本研究旨在比较全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者居家康复与住院康复的效果。
系统检索PubMed、科学网、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆中的随机对照试验;采用改良Jadad量表对研究进行评估。10项涉及1240例患者的试验符合荟萃分析的条件。
结果显示,根据全膝关节置换术后12周或52周的西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数总分、身体功能、僵硬程度、步行测试和牛津膝关节评分,居家康复并不逊色于住院康复(P>0.05)。在最初的12周内,两组之间的疼痛和膝关节活动度均无差异。出乎意料的是,在52周时,住院组的疼痛评分优于居家组(P<0.05),而居家组的膝关节活动度优于住院组(P<0.05)。荟萃分析显示,这两种康复方案的成本相似(P>0.05)。
初次全膝关节置换术后的居家康复与住院康复效果相当,因此是患者的一个重要选择。