Morgan Kate, Hughes Roger
Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD 4226, Australia. Tel 0755954144.
J Allied Health. 2016 Fall;45(3):183-90.
The need to build research capacity within allied health professions has previously been acknowledged as a workforce development strategy required to enhance the effectiveness of the health system. This study aimed to assess consensus among Australian allied health academics about the research- and evaluation-specific competencies required of graduates in the Australian workforce context.
A two-round Delphi study was conducted among a purposively sampled panel of 57 allied health educators from physiotherapy, speech pathology, and dietetics from universities across Australia. Panelists were asked to rate a list of extant research and evaluation competency elements as essential, useful, or not essential for allied health graduates.
Over 30 of the final 69 competency elements were considered essential across the three allied health disciplines. There was limited evidence of significant differences in the proportion of panelists across disciplines rating competency elements as essential, suggesting good interdisciplinary agreement.
The process of assessing consensus on competency expectations against extant health professional competencies suggests opportunities for more efficient interprofessional research and evaluation competency development in the allied health professions. Further, this challenges the logic of keeping allied health students in disciplinary silos in areas where competencies are shared across education programs.
提升卫生系统的有效性需要培养卫生相关专业人员的研究能力,这一点此前已被视为一项劳动力发展战略。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚卫生相关专业学者对于澳大利亚劳动力背景下毕业生所需的特定研究与评估能力的共识。
对来自澳大利亚各大学物理治疗、言语病理学和营养学领域的57名卫生相关专业教育工作者组成的目标样本小组进行了两轮德尔菲研究。要求小组成员将一系列现有的研究和评估能力要素评定为对卫生相关专业毕业生来说是必不可少、有用或不必要的。
在最终的69项能力要素中,超过30项被认为在这三个卫生相关专业中都是必不可少的。各学科将能力要素评定为必不可少的小组成员比例存在显著差异的证据有限,这表明跨学科间达成了良好的共识。
根据现有的卫生专业能力评估能力期望共识的过程,为卫生相关专业中更高效的跨专业研究和评估能力发展提供了机会。此外,这也对在各教育项目能力共享领域将卫生相关专业学生限制在学科壁垒内的逻辑提出了挑战。