Singleton Michael D
a Department of Biostatistics and Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center , University of Kentucky College of Public Health , Lexington , Kentucky.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 May 19;18(4):387-392. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2016.1211271. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
Although numerous observational studies have demonstrated a protective effect of motorcycle helmets against head injury, the degree of protection against specific head injury types remains unclear. Experimental biomechanics studies involving cadavers, animals, and computer models have established that head injuries have varying etiologies. This retrospective cross-sectional study compared helmet protection against skull fracture, cerebral contusion, intracranial hemorrhage, and cerebral concussion in a consecutive series of motorcycle operators involved in recent traffic crashes in Kentucky.
Police collision reports linked to hospital inpatient and emergency department (ED) claims were analyzed for the period 2008 to 2012. Motorcycle operators with known helmet use who were not killed at the crash scene were included in the study. Helmet use was ascertained from the police report. Skull fracture, cerebral contusion, intracranial hemorrhage, and cerebral concussion were identified from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes on the claims records. The relative risks of each type of head injury for helmeted versus unprotected operators were estimated using generalized estimating equations.
Helmets offer substantial protection against skull fracture (relative risk [RR] = 0.31, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23, 0.34), cerebral contusion (RR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.16, 0.53), and intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 0.47, 95% CI, 0.35, 0.63). The findings pertaining to uncomplicated concussion (RR = 0.80, 95% CI, 0.64, 1.01) were inconclusive. A modest protective effect (20% risk reduction) was suggested by the relative risk estimate, but the 95% confidence interval included the null value.
Motorcycle helmets were associated with a 69% reduction in skull fractures, 71% reduction in cerebral contusion, and 53% reduction in intracranial hemorrhage. This study finds that current motorcycle helmets do not protect equally against all types of head injury. Efforts to improve rotational acceleration management in motorcycle helmets should be considered.
尽管众多观察性研究已证明摩托车头盔对头部损伤具有保护作用,但针对特定类型头部损伤的保护程度仍不明确。涉及尸体、动物和计算机模型的实验生物力学研究表明,头部损伤的病因各不相同。这项回顾性横断面研究比较了肯塔基州近期交通事故中连续一系列摩托车驾乘者佩戴头盔对颅骨骨折、脑挫伤、颅内出血和脑震荡的保护作用。
分析了2008年至2012年期间与医院住院患者和急诊科(ED)索赔相关的警方碰撞报告。研究纳入了在事故现场未死亡且已知头盔使用情况的摩托车驾乘者。头盔使用情况从警方报告中确定。根据索赔记录上的国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD - 9 - CM)编码确定颅骨骨折、脑挫伤、颅内出血和脑震荡。使用广义估计方程估计佩戴头盔与未佩戴头盔的驾乘者发生每种类型头部损伤的相对风险。
头盔对颅骨骨折(相对风险[RR]=0.31,95%置信区间[CI],0.23,0.34)、脑挫伤(RR = 0.29,95% CI,0.16,0.53)和颅内出血(RR = 0.47,95% CI,0.35,0.63)具有显著保护作用。关于单纯性脑震荡的研究结果(RR = 0.80,95% CI,0.64,1.01)尚无定论。相对风险估计表明有适度的保护作用(风险降低20%),但95%置信区间包含无效值。
摩托车头盔可使颅骨骨折减少69%,脑挫伤减少71%,颅内出血减少53%。本研究发现,当前的摩托车头盔对所有类型头部损伤的保护作用并不相同。应考虑努力改进摩托车头盔的旋转加速度管理。