• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对甲状腺结节患者的韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统的多中心前瞻性验证研究。

A Multicenter Prospective Validation Study for the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Patients with Thyroid Nodules.

作者信息

Ha Eun Ju, Moon Won-Jin, Na Dong Gyu, Lee Young Hen, Choi Nami, Kim Soo Jin, Kim Jae Kyun

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 16499, Korea.

Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Radiol. 2016 Sep-Oct;17(5):811-21. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.811. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

DOI:10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.811
PMID:27587972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5007410/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate a new risk stratification system for thyroid nodules, the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS), using a prospective design.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2013 to May 2015, 902 thyroid nodules were enrolled from four institutions. The type and predictive value of ultrasonography (US) predictors were analyzed according to the combination of the solidity and echogenicity of nodules; in addition, we determined malignancy risk and diagnostic performance for each category of K-TIRADS, and compared the efficacy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with a three-tier risk categorization system published in 2011.

RESULTS

The malignancy risk was significantly higher in solid hypoechoic nodules, as compared to partially cystic or isohyperechoic nodules (each p < 0.001). The presence of any suspicious US features had a significantly higher malignancy risk (73.4%) in solid hypoechoic nodules than in partially cystic or isohyperechoic nodules (4.3-38.5%; p < 0.001). The calculated malignancy risk in K-TIRADS categories 5, 4, 3, and 2 nodules were 73.4, 19.0, 3.5, and 0.0%, respectively; and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy for malignancy were 95.5, 58.6, 44.5, 96.9, and 69.5%, respectively, in K-TIRADS categories 4 and 5. The efficacy of FNA for detecting malignancy based on K-TIRADS was increased from 18.6% (101/544) to 22.5% (101/449), as compared with the three-tier risk categorization system (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The proposed new risk stratification system based on solidity and echogenicity was useful for risk stratification of thyroid nodules and the decision for FNA. The malignancy risk of K-TIRADS was in agreement with the findings of a previous retrospective study.

摘要

目的

采用前瞻性设计验证一种新的甲状腺结节风险分层系统——韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(K-TIRADS)。

材料与方法

2013年6月至2015年5月,从四家机构纳入902个甲状腺结节。根据结节的实性和回声性组合分析超声(US)预测指标的类型和预测价值;此外,我们确定了K-TIRADS各分类的恶性风险和诊断性能,并将细针穿刺活检(FNA)的有效性与2011年发布的三级风险分类系统进行比较。

结果

与部分囊性或等/高回声结节相比,实性低回声结节的恶性风险显著更高(各p<0.001)。实性低回声结节中存在任何可疑US特征的恶性风险(73.4%)显著高于部分囊性或等/高回声结节(4.3%-38.5%;p<0.001)。K-TIRADS分类为5、4、3和2类结节的计算恶性风险分别为73.4%、19.0%、3.5%和0.0%;K-TIRADS分类为4和5类时,恶性肿瘤的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为95.5%、58.6%、44.5%、96.9%和69.5%。与三级风险分类系统相比,基于K-TIRADS检测恶性肿瘤的FNA有效性从18.6%(101/544)提高到22.5%(101/449)(p<0.001)。

结论

基于实性和回声性提出的新风险分层系统有助于甲状腺结节的风险分层和FNA决策。K-TIRADS的恶性风险与先前一项回顾性研究的结果一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1d/5007410/6f046cb29bc5/kjr-17-811-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1d/5007410/6f046cb29bc5/kjr-17-811-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d1d/5007410/6f046cb29bc5/kjr-17-811-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Multicenter Prospective Validation Study for the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Patients with Thyroid Nodules.一项针对甲状腺结节患者的韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统的多中心前瞻性验证研究。
Korean J Radiol. 2016 Sep-Oct;17(5):811-21. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.5.811. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
2
Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Categorization Based on Solidity and Echogenicity.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺结节的风险分层:基于实性和回声性的分类
Thyroid. 2016 Apr;26(4):562-72. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0460. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
3
Cytology-Ultrasonography Risk-Stratification Scoring System Based on Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and the Korean-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.基于细针抽吸细胞学和韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统的细胞学-超声风险分层评分系统。
Thyroid. 2017 Jul;27(7):953-959. doi: 10.1089/thy.2016.0603. Epub 2017 May 19.
4
Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Patterns by K-TIRADS and 2015 ATA Guidelines in Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules and Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance.超声 K-TIRADS 分类与 2015 年 ATA 指南在甲状腺结节及滤泡性肿瘤良恶性危险分层中的诊断效能
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Aug;213(2):444-450. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20961. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
Malignancy risk stratification in thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic results at cytologic examination: combination of thyroid imaging reporting and data system and the Bethesda System.甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学检查结果不明确的甲状腺结节恶性风险分层:甲状腺影像报告和数据系统与 Bethesda 系统的联合应用。
Radiology. 2015 Jan;274(1):287-95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140359. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
6
Prediction of thyroid nodule malignancy using thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TIRADS) and nodule size.使用甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TIRADS)及结节大小预测甲状腺结节的恶性程度。
Clin Imaging. 2020 Apr;60(2):222-227. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
7
Non-Marked Hypoechogenic Nodules: Multicenter Study on the Thyroid Malignancy Risk Stratification and Accuracy Based on TIRADS Systems Comparison.非典型低回声结节:基于 TIRADS 系统比较的甲状腺恶性肿瘤风险分层和准确性的多中心研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 9;58(2):257. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020257.
8
Malignancy risk stratification in thyroid nodules with benign results on cytology: combination of thyroid imaging reporting and data system and Bethesda system.甲状腺结节细胞学检查结果为良性时的恶性风险分层:甲状腺影像报告和数据系统与贝塞斯达系统的联合应用
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;21(6):1898-903. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3556-2. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
9
An ultrasonogram reporting system for thyroid nodules stratifying cancer risk for clinical management.一种用于甲状腺结节的超声报告系统,为临床管理对癌症风险进行分层。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 May;94(5):1748-51. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1724. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
10
Interrater Reliability of Various Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) Classifications for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Thyroid Nodules.不同甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TIRADS)分类在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节方面的评分者间可靠性
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Apr 29;20(4):1283-1288. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.4.1283.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules Using Ultrasound Cine-Loop Video Sequences.使用超声动态循环视频序列对甲状腺结节进行风险分层
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 9;17(16):2616. doi: 10.3390/cancers17162616.
2
Malignancy risk stratification and subcategorization of K-TIRADS intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules: a retrospective multicenter study.K-TIRADS中度可疑甲状腺结节的恶性风险分层及亚分类:一项回顾性多中心研究
Ultrasonography. 2024 Mar;43(2):132-140. doi: 10.14366/usg.23203. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Diagnostic performance of a new two-dimensional shear wave elastography expression using siemens ultrasound system combined with ACR TI-RADS for classification of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: A prospective multi-center study.

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrasonography Diagnosis and Imaging-Based Management of Thyroid Nodules: Revised Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Consensus Statement and Recommendations.甲状腺结节的超声诊断及基于影像学的管理:韩国甲状腺放射学会修订共识声明及建议
Korean J Radiol. 2016 May-Jun;17(3):370-95. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2016.17.3.370. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
2
Thyroid nodules with isolated macrocalcification: malignancy risk and diagnostic efficacy of fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy.孤立性粗大钙化甲状腺结节:细针抽吸和核心针活检的恶性风险和诊断效能。
Ultrasonography. 2016 Jul;35(3):212-9. doi: 10.14366/usg.15074. Epub 2015 Dec 27.
3
使用西门子超声系统结合美国放射学会(ACR)甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)的新型二维剪切波弹性成像表达对甲状腺良恶性结节进行分类的诊断性能:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 27;9(10):e20472. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20472. eCollection 2023 Oct.
4
Does a three-degree hypoechogenicity grading improve ultrasound thyroid nodule risk stratification and affect the TI-RADS 4 category? A retrospective observational study.超声甲状腺结节三度低回声分级是否能改善风险分层,影响 TI-RADS 4 类?一项回顾性观察研究。
Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2023 May 12;67(4):e000608. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000608.
5
Diagnostic Performance of Various Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems for Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: A Meta-Analysis.各种超声风险分层系统对甲状腺良恶性结节的诊断性能:一项荟萃分析。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jan 9;15(2):424. doi: 10.3390/cancers15020424.
6
Development and validation of a novel diagnostic tool for predicting the malignancy probability of thyroid nodules: A retrospective study based on clinical, B-mode, color doppler and elastographic ultrasonographic characteristics.基于临床、B 型、彩色多普勒和弹性超声特征,开发和验证一种新的甲状腺结节恶性概率预测诊断工具:一项回顾性研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 20;13:966572. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.966572. eCollection 2022.
7
Changes in Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid Cancer Screening before and after the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Revision.韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统修订前后甲状腺癌筛查诊断性能的变化。
Korean J Fam Med. 2022 Jul;43(4):225-230. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.21.0168. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
8
The European Institute of Oncology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for Classification of Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Study.欧洲肿瘤研究所甲状腺结节分类的甲状腺影像报告和数据系统:一项前瞻性研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 6;11(11):3238. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113238.
9
Introducing a Pole Concept for Nodule Growth in the Thyroid Gland: Taller-than-Wide Shape, Frequency, Location and Risk of Malignancy of Thyroid Nodules in an Area with Iodine Deficiency.引入甲状腺结节生长的极点概念:碘缺乏地区甲状腺结节的高宽比、频率、位置及恶性风险
J Clin Med. 2022 May 1;11(9):2549. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092549.
10
Non-Marked Hypoechogenic Nodules: Multicenter Study on the Thyroid Malignancy Risk Stratification and Accuracy Based on TIRADS Systems Comparison.非典型低回声结节:基于 TIRADS 系统比较的甲状腺恶性肿瘤风险分层和准确性的多中心研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 9;58(2):257. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020257.
Thyroid nodules with minimal cystic changes have a low risk of malignancy.
甲状腺结节伴轻微囊性变恶性风险低。
Ultrasonography. 2016 Apr;35(2):153-8. doi: 10.14366/usg.15070. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
4
Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules: Categorization Based on Solidity and Echogenicity.甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺结节的风险分层:基于实性和回声性的分类
Thyroid. 2016 Apr;26(4):562-72. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0460. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
5
2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.2015年美国甲状腺协会成人甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌管理指南:美国甲状腺协会甲状腺结节和分化型甲状腺癌指南工作组
Thyroid. 2016 Jan;26(1):1-133. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0020.
6
Risk stratification of thyroid nodules on ultrasonography with the French TI-RADS: description and reflections.超声检查中甲状腺结节的风险分层:法国 TI-RADS 的描述和思考。
Ultrasonography. 2016 Jan;35(1):25-38. doi: 10.14366/usg.15027. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
7
Pathology Reporting of Thyroid Core Needle Biopsy: A Proposal of the Korean Endocrine Pathology Thyroid Core Needle Biopsy Study Group.甲状腺粗针穿刺活检的病理报告:韩国内分泌病理学会甲状腺粗针穿刺活检研究组的提议
J Pathol Transl Med. 2015 Jul;49(4):288-99. doi: 10.4132/jptm.2015.06.04. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
8
Inter-observer variation in ultrasound measurement of the volume and diameter of thyroid nodules.甲状腺结节体积和直径超声测量的观察者间差异。
Korean J Radiol. 2015 May-Jun;16(3):560-5. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.3.560. Epub 2015 May 13.
9
Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a consensus statement by the korean society of thyroid radiology.超声引导下甲状腺结节细针穿刺活检:韩国甲状腺放射学会共识声明
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Mar-Apr;16(2):391-401. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.391. Epub 2015 Feb 27.
10
Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification for Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules: A Four-Tier Categorization System.基于超声的甲状腺结节恶性风险分层:一种四级分类系统。
Eur Radiol. 2015 Jul;25(7):2153-62. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3621-7. Epub 2015 Feb 14.