• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the bevacizumab-irinotecan regimen in the treatment of primary glioblastoma multiforme recurrences.贝伐单抗联合伊立替康方案治疗多形性胶质母细胞瘤原发性复发的成本效益分析。
Oncol Lett. 2016 Sep;12(3):1935-1940. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4871. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
2
Effectiveness of the bevacizumab-irinotecan regimen in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: Comparison with other second-line treatments without this regimen.贝伐单抗联合伊立替康方案治疗复发性多形性胶质母细胞瘤的疗效:与未采用该方案的其他二线治疗方法的比较。
Oncol Lett. 2012 Nov;4(5):1114-1118. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.861. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
3
Irinotecan and bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.伊立替康联合贝伐珠单抗治疗复发性多形性胶质母细胞瘤。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2011 Apr;12(5):825-33. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2011.566558. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
4
Comparative cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab-irinotecan-fluorouracil versus irinotecan-fluorouracil in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer.贝伐单抗-伊立替康-氟尿嘧啶与伊立替康-氟尿嘧啶用于一线转移性结直肠癌的成本效益比较
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2014 Oct;20(5):341-50. doi: 10.1177/1078155213508437. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
5
Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.贝伐单抗和西妥昔单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(12):1-128, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11120.
6
The optimal regimen of bevacizumab for recurrent glioblastoma: does dose matter?贝伐单抗治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤的最佳方案:剂量重要吗?
J Neurooncol. 2016 May;127(3):493-502. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-2025-5. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
7
Clinical Impact of Bevacizumab in Patients with Relapsed Glioblastoma: Focus on a Real-Life Monocentric SurVey (SV1 Study).贝伐单抗对复发性胶质母细胞瘤患者的临床影响:聚焦一项真实世界单中心调查(SV1研究)
Chemotherapy. 2016;61(5):269-74. doi: 10.1159/000443719. Epub 2016 Apr 9.
8
Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy plus bevacizumab after response to bevacizumab plus irinotecan as a rescue treatment for high-grade gliomas.在贝伐单抗联合伊立替康治疗出现反应后,采用分割立体定向放射治疗联合贝伐单抗作为高级别胶质瘤的挽救治疗。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
9
Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.贝伐单抗联合伊立替康治疗复发性多形性胶质母细胞瘤
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct 20;25(30):4722-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2440.
10
A meta-analysis of bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in the treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.贝伐单抗单药治疗及联合伊立替康治疗复发性多形性胶质母细胞瘤的荟萃分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2012 Dec;19(12):1636-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.12.028. Epub 2012 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of 11 pharmacotherapies for recurrent glioblastoma in the USA and China.美国和中国11种复发性胶质母细胞瘤药物治疗的成本效益分析。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Jul 31;16:17588359241264727. doi: 10.1177/17588359241264727. eCollection 2024.
2
Use of Bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: a scoping review and evidence map.贝伐珠单抗在复发性脑胶质瘤中的应用:范围综述和证据图谱。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11043-6.
3
Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.治疗胶质母细胞瘤进展或复发的选择:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 4;5(1):CD013579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013579.pub2.
4
Neuro-oncologists have spoken - the role of bevacizumab in the inpatient setting. A clinical and economic conundrum.神经肿瘤学家已发声——贝伐单抗在住院环境中的作用。一个临床和经济难题。
Neurooncol Pract. 2019 Jan;6(1):30-36. doi: 10.1093/nop/npy011. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
5
Effect of health disparities on overall survival of patients with glioblastoma.健康差异对胶质母细胞瘤患者总生存期的影响。
J Neurooncol. 2019 Apr;142(2):365-374. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03108-z. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

本文引用的文献

1
CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007-2011.CBTRUS统计报告:2007 - 2011年在美国诊断出的原发性脑和中枢神经系统肿瘤
Neuro Oncol. 2014 Oct;16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv1-63. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nou223.
2
Effectiveness of the bevacizumab-irinotecan regimen in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: Comparison with other second-line treatments without this regimen.贝伐单抗联合伊立替康方案治疗复发性多形性胶质母细胞瘤的疗效:与未采用该方案的其他二线治疗方法的比较。
Oncol Lett. 2012 Nov;4(5):1114-1118. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.861. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
3
Impact of therapy on quality of life, neurocognitive function and their correlates in glioblastoma multiforme: a review.多形性胶质母细胞瘤治疗对生活质量、神经认知功能及其相关性的影响:综述。
J Neurooncol. 2011 Sep;104(3):639-46. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0565-x. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
4
Central nervous system cancers.中枢神经系统癌症。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011 Apr;9(4):352-400. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2011.0036.
5
Population-based incidence and survival of central nervous system (CNS) malignancies in Girona (Spain) 1994-2005.基于人群的西班牙赫罗纳地区中枢神经系统(CNS)恶性肿瘤发病率和生存率:1994-2005 年。
J Neurooncol. 2011 Jan;101(1):117-23. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0240-7. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
6
FDA drug approval summary: bevacizumab (Avastin) as treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.美国食品和药物管理局药物审批摘要:贝伐单抗(阿瓦斯汀)治疗复发性多形性胶质母细胞瘤。
Oncologist. 2009 Nov;14(11):1131-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0121. Epub 2009 Nov 6.
7
Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma.贝伐单抗单药及联合伊立替康治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4733-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8721. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
8
Bevacizumab and chemotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma: a single-institution experience.贝伐单抗与化疗治疗复发性胶质母细胞瘤:单机构经验
Neurology. 2009 Apr 7;72(14):1217-22. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000345668.03039.90.
9
Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma.复发性胶质母细胞瘤中,先使用单药贝伐单抗,肿瘤进展时再使用贝伐单抗联合伊立替康的II期试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 10;27(5):740-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3055. Epub 2008 Dec 29.
10
Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in the treatment patients with progressive recurrent malignant brain tumours.贝伐单抗联合伊立替康治疗进展性复发性恶性脑肿瘤患者。
Acta Oncol. 2009;48(1):52-8. doi: 10.1080/02841860802537924.

贝伐单抗联合伊立替康方案治疗多形性胶质母细胞瘤原发性复发的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the bevacizumab-irinotecan regimen in the treatment of primary glioblastoma multiforme recurrences.

作者信息

Ruiz-Sánchez Daniel, Peinado Irene Iglesias, Alaguero-Calero Miguel, Sastre-Heres Alejandro José, Diez Benito García, Peña-Díaz Jaime

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Central Universitary Hospital of Asturias, 33011 Oviedo, Asturias, Spain; School of Pharmacy, The Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

School of Pharmacy, The Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2016 Sep;12(3):1935-1940. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4871. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

DOI:10.3892/ol.2016.4871
PMID:27588142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4998143/
Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to calculate the cost-effectiveness of the inclusion of the bevacizumab (BVZ) + irinotecan (CPT-11) regimen in the second-line of treatment for primary glioblastoma multiforme. A retrospective cohort study with a control group was performed in which the cost-effectiveness of a course of chemotherapy was calculated based on survival time and the incremental cost between the two lines of treatment. A total of 77 patients were included, 36 of who formed the BVZ/CPT-11 cohort. The median survival time for the non-BVZ control cohort was 13.23 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.79-14.68], while for the BVZ/CPT-11 treatment cohort, the median survival time was 17.63 months (95% CI, 15.38-19.89). Overall, each year of life gained for each patient treated with BVZ/CPT-11 would cost €46,401.99. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the BVZ/CPT-11 combination, but its incremental cost compared with other lines of treatment or the best care available does not appear to be acceptable for public health systems in the current situation of budgetary adjustments.

摘要

本研究的目的是计算在多形性胶质母细胞瘤一线治疗中加入贝伐单抗(BVZ)+伊立替康(CPT-11)方案的成本效益。进行了一项带有对照组的回顾性队列研究,其中根据生存时间和两线治疗之间的增量成本计算一个化疗疗程的成本效益。共纳入77例患者,其中36例组成BVZ/CPT-11队列。非BVZ对照组的中位生存时间为13.23个月[95%置信区间(CI),11.79 - 14.68],而BVZ/CPT-11治疗组的中位生存时间为17.63个月(95%CI,15.38 - 19.89)。总体而言,接受BVZ/CPT-11治疗的每位患者每延长一年生命的成本为46,401.99欧元。这些结果证明了BVZ/CPT-11联合方案的有效性,但在当前预算调整的情况下,与其他治疗线或现有最佳治疗相比,其增量成本对于公共卫生系统似乎是不可接受的。