Magaro P A, Moss B F
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1222.
Cortex. 1989 Jun;25(2):317-24. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(89)80046-2.
A modification of the tachistoscopic letter detection task employed by Neisser (1963) was utilized to examine hemispheric differences in employing analytic and holistic processing strategies. Stimulus arrays designed to elicit either serial or parallel processing sets were presented to the right hemisphere-left visual field (RH-LVF) or to the left hemisphere-right visual field (LH-RVF). Subjects were explicitly directed to perform an analytic or holistic encoding process on both types of stimulus arrays. The serial array produced longer reaction times than the parallel array for both hemispheres. A RH-LVF reaction time advantage was found across both stimulus sets and instructions. In addition, an overall reaction time advantage was found for holistic instructions relative to analytic instructions, but this superiority was not effected by hemisphere or contextual stimuli.
采用了奈塞尔(1963年)所使用的速示字母检测任务的一种变体,以检验在运用分析性和整体性加工策略方面的半球差异。设计用于引发序列或平行加工集的刺激阵列被呈现给右半球-左视野(RH-LVF)或左半球-右视野(LH-RVF)。明确指示受试者对两种类型的刺激阵列都执行分析性或整体性编码过程。对于两个半球来说,序列阵列产生的反应时间比平行阵列更长。在两种刺激集和指令下都发现了右半球-左视野的反应时间优势。此外,相对于分析性指令,发现整体性指令总体上有反应时间优势,但这种优势不受半球或情境刺激的影响。