Camarillo Mary Kay, Domen Jeremy K, Stringfellow William T
Ecological Engineering Research Program, School of Engineering & Computer Science, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Avenue, Stockton, CA 95211, USA.
Ecological Engineering Research Program, School of Engineering & Computer Science, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Avenue, Stockton, CA 95211, USA.
J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 1;183:164-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.065. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
Produced water is a significant waste stream that can be treated and reused; however, the removal of production chemicals-such as those added in hydraulic fracturing-must be addressed. One motivation for treating and reusing produced water is that current disposal methods-typically consisting of deep well injection and percolation in infiltration pits-are being limited. Furthermore, oil and gas production often occurs in arid regions where there is demand for new water sources. In this paper, hydraulic fracturing chemical additive data from California are used as a case study where physical-chemical and biodegradation data are summarized and used to screen for appropriate produced water treatment technologies. The data indicate that hydraulic fracturing chemicals are largely treatable; however, data are missing for 24 of the 193 chemical additives identified. More than one-third of organic chemicals have data indicating biodegradability, suggesting biological treatment would be effective. Adsorption-based methods and partitioning of chemicals into oil for subsequent separation is expected to be effective for approximately one-third of chemicals. Volatilization-based treatment methods (e.g. air stripping) will only be effective for approximately 10% of chemicals. Reverse osmosis is a good catch-all with over 70% of organic chemicals expected to be removed efficiently. Other technologies such as electrocoagulation and advanced oxidation are promising but lack demonstration. Chemicals of most concern due to prevalence, toxicity, and lack of data include propargyl alcohol, 2-mercaptoethyl alcohol, tetrakis hydroxymethyl-phosphonium sulfate, thioglycolic acid, 2-bromo-3-nitrilopropionamide, formaldehyde polymers, polymers of acrylic acid, quaternary ammonium compounds, and surfactants (e.g. ethoxylated alcohols). Future studies should examine the fate of hydraulic fracturing chemicals in produced water treatment trains to demonstrate removal and clarify interactions between upstream and downstream processes.
采出水是一种可处理和再利用的重要废物流;然而,必须解决去除生产化学品(如水力压裂中添加的那些化学品)的问题。处理和再利用采出水的一个动机是当前的处置方法(通常包括深井注入和在渗滤坑中渗透)正受到限制。此外,石油和天然气生产通常发生在对新水源有需求的干旱地区。在本文中,来自加利福尼亚的水力压裂化学添加剂数据被用作案例研究,其中总结了物理化学和生物降解数据,并用于筛选合适的采出水处理技术。数据表明,水力压裂化学品在很大程度上是可处理的;然而,在193种已识别的化学添加剂中,有24种的数据缺失。超过三分之一的有机化学品有数据表明其具有生物降解性,这表明生物处理将是有效的。基于吸附的方法以及将化学品分配到油中以便随后分离,预计对大约三分之一的化学品有效。基于挥发的处理方法(如空气吹脱)仅对大约10%的化学品有效。反渗透是一种很好的通用方法,预计超过70%的有机化学品能被有效去除。其他技术如电凝聚和高级氧化很有前景,但缺乏实例证明。由于普遍存在、毒性和数据缺乏而最受关注的化学品包括丙炔醇、2 - 巯基乙醇、四羟甲基硫酸磷、巯基乙酸、2 - 溴 - 3 - 腈基丙酰胺、甲醛聚合物、丙烯酸聚合物、季铵化合物和表面活性剂(如乙氧基化醇)。未来的研究应考察水力压裂化学品在采出水处理流程中的去向,以证明其去除效果并阐明上游和下游过程之间的相互作用。