• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孩子们还好吗?美国青年中的收入不平等与公民参与度

The Kids are All Right? Income Inequality and Civic Engagement among Our Nation's Youth.

作者信息

Godfrey Erin B, Cherng Hua-Yu Sebastian

机构信息

Department of Applied Psychology, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.

Department of Humanities and Social Sciences in the Professions, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and Human Development, New York University, 246 Greene St., New York, NY, 10003, USA.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Nov;45(11):2218-2232. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0557-4. Epub 2016 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10964-016-0557-4
PMID:27591982
Abstract

Prior work suggests that income inequality depresses civic participation among adults. However, associations between income inequality and youth civic engagement have not been assessed. This is true despite evidence that other features of communities influence youth civic development. To fill the gap, we examine associations between county-level income inequality and civic engagement among a nationally representative sample of 12,240 15-year-olds (50 % female). We find opposite patterns than those suggested by the adult literature. Higher county-level income inequality is associated with slightly more civic engagement (greater importance of helping others, higher rates of volunteering often), and this is particularly true for low-socioeconomic status and racial/ethnic minority youth. Potential developmental and structural explanations for these differences are offered. In addition, practical implications of these findings are drawn, and future research directions for scholars studying youth are proposed.

摘要

先前的研究表明,收入不平等会抑制成年人的公民参与度。然而,收入不平等与青少年公民参与之间的关联尚未得到评估。尽管有证据表明社区的其他特征会影响青少年的公民发展,但情况依然如此。为了填补这一空白,我们在一个具有全国代表性的12240名15岁青少年(50%为女性)样本中,研究了县级收入不平等与公民参与之间的关联。我们发现的模式与成人文献所表明的相反。县级收入不平等程度越高,公民参与度往往略高(帮助他人的重要性更高、志愿服务率更高),对于社会经济地位较低的青少年以及少数族裔青少年而言尤其如此。我们提供了对这些差异的潜在发展和结构方面的解释。此外,还得出了这些发现的实际意义,并为研究青少年的学者提出了未来的研究方向。

相似文献

1
The Kids are All Right? Income Inequality and Civic Engagement among Our Nation's Youth.孩子们还好吗?美国青年中的收入不平等与公民参与度
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Nov;45(11):2218-2232. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0557-4. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
2
Warm and Supportive Parenting Can Discourage Offspring's Civic Engagement in the Transition to Adulthood.温暖且支持性的养育方式可能会阻碍子女在向成年过渡阶段的公民参与度。
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Nov;45(11):2197-2217. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0511-5. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
3
Impacts of Adolescent and Young Adult Civic Engagement on Health and Socioeconomic Status in Adulthood.青少年和青年公民参与对成年后健康和社会经济地位的影响。
Child Dev. 2019 Jul;90(4):1138-1154. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12998. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
4
The Intersection of Emotional and Sociocognitive Competencies with Civic Engagement in Middle Childhood and Adolescence.情绪和社会认知能力与青少年中期公民参与的交叉。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Aug;47(8):1663-1683. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0842-5. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
5
Adolescents' Civic Engagement: Concordant and Longitudinal Associations Among Civic Beliefs and Civic Involvement.青少年的公民参与:公民信仰与公民参与之间的一致性和纵向关联。
J Res Adolesc. 2019 Dec;29(4):879-896. doi: 10.1111/jora.12423. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
6
Factors related to health civic engagement: results from the 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes to understand progress towards a Culture of Health.与健康公民参与相关的因素:2018 年健康态度全国调查的结果,以了解朝着健康文化方向取得的进展。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 7;20(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08507-w.
7
Youth Engagement, Positive Interethnic Contact, and 'Associational Bridges': A Quasi-Experimental Investigation of a UK National Youth Engagement Scheme.青年参与、积极的跨种族接触和“关联桥梁”:对英国国家青年参与计划的准实验研究。
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Jul;48(7):1264-1280. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01042-x. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
8
Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood.公民参与与成年过渡
Future Child. 2010 Spring;20(1):159-79. doi: 10.1353/foc.0.0043.
9
Examining civic engagement in ethnic minority youth populations: A literature review and concept analysis.审视少数民族青年群体中的公民参与:文献综述与概念分析
Am J Community Psychol. 2023 Mar;71(1-2):54-78. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12643. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
10
Assessing the Link between Adolescents' Awareness of Inequality and Civic Engagement across Time and Racial/Ethnic Groups.评估青少年对不平等的认识与公民参与在时间和种族/族裔群体之间的联系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Mar;51(3):428-442. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01545-6. Epub 2022 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between economic inequality and prosocial behaviour.经济不平等与亲社会行为关系的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Nov;7(11):1899-1916. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01681-y. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
2
Inequality in Volunteering: Building a New Research Front.志愿服务中的不平等:构建一个新的研究前沿
Voluntas. 2022;33(1):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s11266-022-00455-w. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
3
MPOWER: The Impact of a Purpose Program on Adolescents' Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations.MPOWER:目标计划对青少年内在和外在动机的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Unraveling the Complexity of Critical Consciousness, Political Efficacy, and Political Action Among Marginalized Adolescents.剖析边缘化青少年的批判性意识、政治效能和政治行动的复杂性。
Child Dev. 2016 Jan-Feb;87(1):221-38. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12446. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
2
Boring but important: a self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation.枯燥却重要:学习的自我超越目标能促进学业自我调节。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Oct;107(4):559-80. doi: 10.1037/a0037637.
3
Adolescents' theories about economic inequality: why are some people poor while others are rich?
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 16;12:761580. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761580. eCollection 2021.
4
Can White Guilt Motivate Action? The Role of Civic Beliefs.白人的负罪感能激发行动吗?公民信仰的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2021 Jun;50(6):1081-1097. doi: 10.1007/s10964-021-01401-7. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
5
Intersecting experiences, motivating beliefs: The joint roles of class and race/ethnicity in the development of youths' sociopolitical perceptions and participation.交叉经历,激励信念:阶级和种族/民族在青年社会政治观念和参与的发展中的共同作用。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2019;57:169-194. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 May 27.
6
"If they focus on giving us a chance in life we can actually do something in this world": Poverty, inequality, and youths' critical consciousness.“如果他们专注于给我们一个生活的机会,我们实际上可以在这个世界上做些什么”:贫困、不平等和年轻人的批判意识。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Mar;55(3):550-561. doi: 10.1037/dev0000586.
7
Critical Hopefulness Among Urban High School Students.城市高中生的关键希望感。
J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Aug;47(8):1649-1662. doi: 10.1007/s10964-018-0889-3. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
青少年关于经济不平等的理论:为什么有些人贫穷而有些人富有?
Dev Psychol. 2014 Nov;50(11):2512-25. doi: 10.1037/a0037934. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
4
Teaching citizens: the role of open classroom climate in fostering critical consciousness among youth.培养公民:开放课堂氛围在培养青年批判意识中的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 2014 Nov;43(11):1801-17. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-0084-5. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
5
Community-wide job loss and teenage fertility: evidence from North Carolina.社区范围内的失业与青少年生育率:来自北卡罗来纳州的证据。
Demography. 2013 Dec;50(6):2151-71. doi: 10.1007/s13524-013-0231-3.
6
The contribution of the developmental assets framework to positive youth development theory and practice.发展资产框架对积极青年发展理论与实践的贡献。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2011;41:197-230. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-386492-5.00008-7.
7
Income inequality and participation: A comparison of 24 European countries.收入不平等与参与度:24 个欧洲国家的比较。
Soc Sci Res. 2012 Sep;41(5):1166-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.04.005. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
8
Predicting Positive Citizenship from Adolescence to Young Adulthood: The Effects of a Civic Context.预测从青少年到青年期的积极公民意识:公民环境的影响。
Appl Dev Sci. 2008;12(8):38-53. doi: 10.1080/10888690801910567. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
9
Family affluence, school and neighborhood contexts and adolescents' civic engagement: a cross-national study.家庭富裕程度、学校和邻里环境与青少年的公民参与:跨国研究。
Am J Community Psychol. 2012 Sep;50(1-2):197-210. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9489-7.
10
Critical consciousness: current status and future directions.批判意识:现状与未来方向。
New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2011 Winter;2011(134):43-57. doi: 10.1002/cd.310.